1st order or 2nd order distribution

bradyj7
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm fitting a distribution to the starting times of the first car journey in the day. I have a sample of 3,000 journey starting times. I am assuming that this sample represents the population well.

I'm fitting a non parametric distribution.

But my question is, should I fit a 1st order or 2nd order distribution?

It should be second order correct? because there is uncertainty about the parameters?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey bradyj7.

What are you saying doesn't make sense because when you fit something to something else, that something else has existing form that you fit to.

What exactly are you trying to fit to?
 
Hello Chiro,

Well I originally fitted a parametric distribution to the data and a Johnson unbounded distribution was the best fit using an SIC score.

Here it is:

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/54057365/All/g1.JPG

But I did not think that the fit was good enough, so I fitted an Ogive distribution, a non parametric 1st order distribution.

Here it is
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/54057365/All/g2.JPG


However because I only have a sample of journey start times, I am thinking that there is uncertainty about the non-parametric distribution, so perhaps I should fit a non parametric 2nd order distribution. The red line is the uncertainty distribution.

here it is:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/54057365/All/g3.JPG



What do you think?

Thanks
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top