I 2 basis sets, for which one is DFT calc faster?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter AJ007
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Dft Sets
AJ007
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello fellow physicist,
I'm new on this subject, I hope that you can help me clear some stuff out.

If I have 2 basis sets; A containing 100 basis functions and B containing 50 basis functions, for which one of them will a DFT calculation be faster?
Also, is a DFT calculation using basis sets A, more accurate than if it uses B?

Very thankful,
Best regards
AJ
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
AJ007 said:
Hello fellow physicist,
I'm new on this subject, I hope that you can help me clear some stuff out.

If I have 2 basis sets; A containing 100 basis functions and B containing 50 basis functions, for which one of them will a DFT calculation be faster?
Also, is a DFT calculation using basis sets A, more accurate than if it uses B?

Very thankful,
Best regards
AJ
Generally speaking, B would be faster, A would be more precise (lower energies). This is because your completing more calculations for the extra basis functions, but the density in A would be more realistic.
 
  • Like
Likes AJ007
As Ben said, "Generally speaking" B would be faster. However, it should be noted that accuracy of a certain basis set truly depends on the system (molecule) you are dealing with. A larger basis set may not necessarily give more accurate results. You need to do your own tests of basis sets or look up references from journal aritcles. I would suggest looking up works by Don Truhlar from U Minnesota - he must have something out there.
 
  • Like
Likes AJ007
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top