2-body collision: Min and Max speed

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



A ball of mass M traveling at non-relativistic speed v elastically collides with a stationary ball of mass m.

(a)Show that the maximum speed which the second ball can have is:

2Mv/(M+m)(b)What is the minimum speed?

The Attempt at a Solution



(a)
Method 1

Go into ZMF frame:

step 1: find VCM
step 2: u2' = u2 - VCM
step 2: pi = pf = 0
step 3: v2' = -u2
step 4: go back into lab frame by adding VCM

Method 2

1)Speed of approach = speed of separation
2)conservation of momentum
3)done.

But the puzzling thing is that why is this the maximum speed? Isn't this the actual acquired speed?

(b)
Do we assume a head-on collision? If it is a head-on collision won't the speed be the same as part (a)?

assuming a non head-on collision by including angles and stuff doesn't help..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you assume a head-on collision where the second ball travels in the initial direction of ball 1, this is the maximal speed.
Every other collision will give a lower speed.
 
mfb said:
If you assume a head-on collision where the second ball travels in the initial direction of ball 1, this is the maximal speed.
Every other collision will give a lower speed.

so for part (b) it isn't a head-on collision?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top