2 N-Dimensional Space Intersection

AI Thread Summary
Two N-dimensional spaces, Sn1 and Sn2, can intersect to form an M-dimensional space, where M can range from 0 to N-1. The discussion centers on the claim that if Sn1 and Sn2 share one dimension, they intersect in a line, and with two dimensions, they intersect in a plane, continuing this pattern. However, a counter-example is suggested to disprove this, such as two three-dimensional spaces intersecting at a single point, resulting in a 0-dimensional space. This contradicts the original assertion that the intersection must always yield an (M-1) dimensional space. The conversation emphasizes the need for clear examples to challenge the proposed theory.
LLT
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
ok...
first of all, I was discussing with my friend, he propose an argument of, if you have two N-Dimensional Spaces, (let's called it Sn1 and Sn2), they will form another M-Dimensional Spaces, which M is either 0 or M bigger or equal one smaller or equal N-1...

what he said was that if Sn1 and Sn2 got 1 common dimension, it'll intersect in a line, if they got 2 common dimentsion, it'll intersect in a plane, if 3, a 3D space etc... etc...

I dun think this works... But how can I disproved it?

(he knows it doesn't work with 2 planes, coz u can't produce a point with 2 planars intersection, hence he's trying to convince me it works for N greater or equal to 3)
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
That's an interesting question. I think the best way to disprove your friend's argument would be to provide a counter-example where two N-dimensional spaces intersect in something that is not an (M-1) dimensional space. For example, if you have two three-dimensional spaces intersecting in one point, then they would form a 0-dimensional space (the point). This is different from what your friend proposed, since he said that M would either have to be 0 or M bigger or equal one smaller or equal N-1. Hope this helps!
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top