2 Parabolas Intersecting at 2 Know Points.

  • Thread starter Thread starter deltapapazulu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
AI Thread Summary
Two parabolas can intersect at two known points, such as (0, 0) and (50, 3.44), but there are infinitely many parabolas that can satisfy this condition. Even when restricting to parabolas with a vertical axis of symmetry, the general form remains y = ax² + bx, where c equals zero. By substituting the known points into the equation, it is shown that b can be expressed in terms of a, allowing for infinite combinations. Thus, any parabola of the form y = ax² + (0.688 - 50a)x will pass through the specified points. The conclusion is that while two points can define a parabola, they do not uniquely determine it.
deltapapazulu
Messages
84
Reaction score
13
Is it possible to find the equations of 2 parabolas intersecting at 2 known points? For example, (0, 0) and (50, 3.44).
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No. You can construct an infinite number of parabolas passing through two given points.

Even if you require that the parabolas have vertical axis of symmetry there exist an infinite number of parabolas passing through (0,0) and (50, 3.44):
Any such parabola can be written in the form y= ax2+ bx+ c. Setting x=0, y= 0 give 0= c so we still have any parabola of the form y= ax2+ bx passing through (0,0). Set x= 50, y= 3.44 gives 3.44= 2500a+ 50b so b= 0.0688- 50a. Any parabola of the form y= ax2+ (0.688- 50a)x with a any real number passses through (0,0) and (50, 3.44).
 
This thread was also posted in homework help.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top