2 people in a canoe, switch places, canoe moves, find mass of one person

  • Thread starter Thread starter musicfairy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Switch
AI Thread Summary
Ricardo and Carmelita, in a 20 kg canoe, switch seats while it moves 45 cm relative to a submerged log. The problem revolves around calculating Carmelita's mass based on the conservation of the center of mass, which remains unchanged during their exchange. The correct approach involves calculating the contributions of each person's movement and the canoe's movement to the overall center of mass. After several attempts and corrections, it is determined that Carmelita's mass is approximately 56.52 kg. The discussion emphasizes understanding the concept of mΔx and how to apply it correctly in such problems.
musicfairy
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Ricardo, mass 80 kg, and Carmelita, who is lighter, are enjoying Lake Merced at dusk in a 20 kg canoe. When the canoe is at rest in the placid water, they exchange seats, which are 3.0 m apart and symmetrically located with respect to the canoe's center. Ricardo notices that the canoe moved 45 cm relative to a submerged log during the exchange and calculates Carmelita's mass, which she has not told him. What is it?

I don't really get those sort of problems, so I tried cutting and pasting into a problem similar to this one. This is what I tried to do:

xcom = xcom

80(0) + 20(1.5) + 3m = 80(3-x) + 20(1.5-x) + m(3-x)

After plugging 0.45 for x, I ended up with m = 500 kg.


What's the right way to do this problem?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You seem to understand that the center of mass of the system does not change. What I'd do is find the change in the center of mass (mΔx) due to each object's movement--the three contributions must add to zero. Hint: Measure the movements with respect to the submerged log.
 
So I tried to find the change in position of com. It didn't work to well. This is what I tried:

xcom = (80(0) + 20(1.5) + 3m) / (100 + 3m)

xcom = (80(0.45) + 20(1.5 + 0.45) + 3.45m) / (100 + 3m)

The I subtracted the first from the second and set it equal to 0.45.

I guess that was a bad attempt. What hints can you give me to get on the right track?
 
musicfairy said:
What hints can you give me to get on the right track?
Just what I told you: Find mΔx for each object, measuring Δx with respect to the submerged log. Also, since Ricardo is heavier, if he moves to the right, which way does the canoe move?
 
I had the same setup equation as before, except this time I changed the positions.

I assume that at Ricando is originally at x = 0, and the log is also there. When Ricardo and Carmelita switched places, the canoe moves left 0.45 m. So this time I made the equation:

(80(0.45) + 20(1.5-0.45) + 0.45m) / (100 + m) = (225 - 0.45m) / (100 + m)

The original equation is: xcom = (80(0) + 20(1.5) + 3m) / (100 + m)

I subtracted the original from the switched

(225 - 0.45m - 30 - 3m) / 100 = 0.45
195 - 3.45m = 45 + 0.45m
m = 38.46 kg


Is this what you mean by mΔx?
 
musicfairy said:
Is this what you mean by mΔx?
Here's what I mean by mΔx:

The canoe (m = 20) moves 45cm left with respect to the log (Δx = -0.45), so mΔx = - 20*0.45.

Ricardo moves 3 m to the right with respect to the canoe, so how far does he move with respect to the log? Use that logic to figure out mΔx for him.

Then do similar thinking for Carmelita.

Note: The change in center of mass of the system (canoe and two people) will equal ∑(mΔx)/(Total mass). But since we know that the change is zero, we can just say ∑(mΔx) = 0. (I hope that makes sense.)
 
I assumed that Δx would be the original - 0.45. I can't think of it in any other way. Then I guess my first set up is correct since I figured what you mean by com doesn't change.

So would Ricardo's Δx be 3.0 - 0.45?

So is the equation

80(0) + 20(1.5) + 3m = 80(2.55) + 21 - 0.45m

m = 56.52 kg

?
 
Looks good.

Here's how I would have done it:

canoe: mΔx = -(20)*(0.45)
man: mΔx = (80)*(3-0.45)
woman: mΔx = (m)*(-3.45)

Add it up and set equal to zero. (Equivalent to what you did.)
 
Thank you so much! I understand this type of problem a lot better now.
 
Back
Top