2 Reactions of 2 objects are not at equilibrium

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the concept of equilibrium in the context of forces acting on objects. It clarifies that when a body is placed on a smooth surface, the surface exerts an upward force while the body exerts a downward force, which are equal and opposite according to Newton's Third Law. However, for the body to be in equilibrium, the net forces acting on it must sum to zero, which includes the gravitational force acting downward. The confusion arises from misunderstanding that the action-reaction forces do not act on the same object, thus they do not determine the equilibrium of the object itself. Ultimately, equilibrium is achieved when all forces acting on a single object cancel out, leading to no net force.
kira506
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Why are the reactions from two objects not at equilibrium ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question. In particular, I don't understand what you mean by "reactions [...] not at equilibrium". Can you please give a specific example?
 
jtbell said:
I don't understand your question. In particular, I don't understand what you mean by "reactions [...] not at equilibrium". Can you please give a specific example?


sorry , I was in a hurry XD
I meant if a body is placed on a smooth surface ,the surface exerts a reaction on the body and so does the body so why are they not at equilinrium , I know its because of the weight mg , I know , but I can't understand why , I mean the 2 reactions are enough bec. According to Newton) 3rd law , every action has a reaction equal in magnitude but opposite in direction , unless the values of reactions are not equal ?
 
I still cannot make sense of your question because "if a body is placed on a smooth surface ,the surface exerts a reaction on the body and so does the body" (assuming the surface is horizontal) then we do have an equilibrium situation. As long as all force vectors cancel, so there is no net force, then we have equilibrium. I also do not understand "unless the values of the reactions are not equal". That is certainly NOT part of Newton's 3rd law.
 
kira506 said:
so why are they not at equilinrium

You still haven't said what you mean by "not at equilibrium." Like HallsofIvy, I don't understand what you're really asking about.

Right now, my coffee cup is resting on the table next to my elbow. The table exerts an upwards force on the coffee cup. The coffee cup exerts a downwards force on the table. These two forces are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction, according to Newton's Third Law. The coffee cup is also in equilibrium, because it's stationary (not accelerating).

Note however, that the reason why the coffee cup is in equilibrium is not because the two forces named above add up to zero, because those two forces act on different objects. (Maybe this is what is confusing you?)

The coffee cup is in equilibrium because the forces that act on it add up to zero. One force is the upwards force exerted by the table. The other force is the downwards gravitational force exerted by the earth. These two forces add up to zero, therefore the coffee cup is in equlibrium.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top