2CuO + C -> Something else than 2Cu + CO2

  • Thread starter Thread starter mertzi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Co2
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a chemistry lab experiment where copper(II) oxide reacts with carbon, leading to the formation of copper and potentially other products. Participants explore the possibility of different reactions occurring, particularly the formation of copper(I) oxide (Cu2O) alongside pure copper, as well as the role of carbon monoxide in the reaction. There is confusion about the products observed, with some students noting the presence of black solids that are not charcoal. The conversation highlights the importance of the reactant mixture's distribution and the influence of oxygen from the air on the reaction outcomes. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of the chemical reactions involved and the need for careful observation and analysis.
mertzi
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Hello! I really hope I get my post right this time because if not the rules are really hard to understand.

1. Homework Statement

We did a lab the other day where copper(II)oxide reacts with carbon (charcoal powder) when adding heat from a bunsen burner. Our experiment was a success but I'm struggling with what our teacher said afterwards; that there can be two different reactions where two different solids form. We studied the product/products afterwards under a loupe and you could clearly see pure copper but also a lot of black solid something attached to the copper and it didn't look like charcoal because there were a small amount of leftovers which clearly looked like small pieces of charcoal, also they weren't attached to the copper. But according to the chemical equation the carbon should be excessive, does the charcoal carbon transform into some other form of carbon (besides the CO2)?

Homework Equations


First reaction:
2CuO + C → 2Cu + CO2
This one I understand completely, this is called single replacement I think?

The molar ratio is 2:1:2:1

amount of substances:
nCuO = 0,025 moles
nC = 0,021 moles

C is excessive which means the theoretical exchange is 0,025 moles Cu and 0,0125 moles CO2, is this correct? Unfortunately we didn't think of weighing the product, the lab mainly was about collecting the CO2 and calculating the exchange percentage of real exchange divided by theoretical exchange.

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand this is completely wrong but the rules have to be obeyed so here is my wild hypothesis for the second reaction:
CuO + C + O2 → CuCO3
I know this is copper(II) carbonate and it should be green and it doesn't form from combustion but that's the only other reaction I can think of from the reactants.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know other oxides of copper and carbon?
 
I think so but the only other elements I can think of that can take part of the reaction is nitrogen or water from the air.
 
What do you mean with "you think so"? Are there other oxides or not?
 
DrDu said:
What do you mean with "you think so"? Are there other oxides or not?

Yes, I know other oxides like iron oxide, aluminium oxide etc. Do you mean I should post all oxides I can think of? I'm sorry to say that it's not encouraging to be met with such condescension.
 
No, I said other oxides of copper and carbon.
 
Carbon monoxide and carbon trioxide but those are not solids. Also Cu2O and Cu2O3 but these are still copper oxides? I'm sorry I've been reasoning here for 20 minutes but I really get nowhere.
 
I never heard of carbon trioxide, but you should take a closer look at carbon monoxide. What would happen if most of the carbon did not react to the dioxide but the monoxide?
 
DrDu said:
I never heard of carbon trioxide, but you should take a closer look at carbon monoxide. What would happen if most of the carbon did not react to the dioxide but the monoxide?

Then the CuO would be excessive instead of the C? But do you really count "leftovers" as something that form in a chemical reaction?
 
  • #10
No, but this at least could explain your observation.
There is still another possibility, if really CuO where there in excess, namely that some Cu2O did form. What appearance do you expect for Cu2O?
 
  • #11
I don't understand the last question? Do you mean how it looks? I don't know how it looks, google image search says it looks red/orange. Actually I think other students had this happen, me and my lab partner were the only who got much solid copper, we saw this when we disposed our product. Our product didn't have anything red in it but others did.
 
  • #12
Ok, so probably at least some of your class mates got some copper-I-oxide and this was what your teacher was referring to.
You could try to cook up some reaction equations.
 
  • #13
OK! Could this be because how well distributed your mixture of CuO and charcoal is before applying heat?
 
  • #14
Yes. Another factor is the reaction of the coal with oxygen from air.
 
  • #15
Ok thank you for your help!
 
  • #16
You are welcome!
 
Back
Top