2D Kinematics I tried so hard

AI Thread Summary
A user is struggling to calculate the truck's velocity relative to the ground, given its velocity relative to a car and the car's velocity relative to the ground. Initial calculations using incorrect angles led to wrong results for both magnitude and direction. A suggestion was made to ensure consistent values in calculations, particularly using the correct angle of 48.5 degrees instead of 45 degrees. The user acknowledged the mistake and noted the need to recalculate the y-component based on the correct angle. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accuracy in vector components for solving 2D kinematics problems.
lmbiango
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
2D Kinematics Please Help! I tried so hard

Relative to the ground, a car has a velocity of 17.3 m/s, directed due north. Relative to this car, a truck has a velocity of 20.5 m/s directed 48.5 ° south of east. Find the (a) magnitude and (b) direction of the truck's velocity relative to the ground. Give the directional angle relative to due east.

I got:

Vcg = 0x + 17.3y
Vtg = 20.5 cos (45) - 20.5 sin(45)

The resultant is: 14.496x + 2.804y
So, by the Pythagorean theorem, Vtg = 14.765

(But that's wrong)

And the direction would be: Inverse tangent of (2.804/14.496)

so it's 10.948 degrees

And that's wrong too.

I also tried it with adding the 20.5 sin(45) on the Vtg part, but those answers are wrong too. I don't know what to do!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Hi lmbiango,

lmbiango said:
Relative to the ground, a car has a velocity of 17.3 m/s, directed due north. Relative to this car, a truck has a velocity of 20.5 m/s directed 48.5 ° south of east. Find the (a) magnitude and (b) direction of the truck's velocity relative to the ground. Give the directional angle relative to due east.

I got:

Vcg = 0x + 17.3y
Vtg = 20.5 cos (45) - 20.5 sin(45)

I don't see why are you using 45 degrees here; they give a different angle in the problem.
 


you're right, that was my first dumb mistake... but even after getting the correct number for Vtg, which I now have 13.584, the angle is still incorrect. If I do, inverse tangent of (2.804/13.723) = 11.548, that is wrong for the angle and I only have one try left.
 


lmbiango said:
you're right, that was my first dumb mistake... but even after getting the correct number for Vtg, which I now have 13.584, the angle is still incorrect. If I do, inverse tangent of (2.804/13.723) = 11.548, that is wrong for the angle and I only have one try left.


Looking at your numbers, I think you might be mixing up a few numbers.

You say the answer for Vtg was 13.584, but in your inverse tangent equation you have 13.723 in the denominator. These should be the same number and I think the 13.723 is correct, so you might want to check why you have different numbers.

In the numerator of your inverse tangent you use 2.804, which was the y component you found when using the incorrect angle of 45 degrees. You need the new total y component from using 48.5 degrees.
 


you're right, thanks, I got it now!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top