2d Kinematics Problem Final Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a 2D kinematics problem to find the final velocity of an object just before it hits the ground. The user has calculated the initial horizontal and vertical components of velocity, as well as the time of flight, but is struggling with the final velocity calculation. Key advice includes recognizing that the horizontal component remains constant and that the vertical component can be determined using the equation for motion under gravity. The user is reminded that the magnitude of velocity cannot be negative, indicating a potential error in their calculations. Clarification on the correct application of kinematic equations is emphasized to resolve the issue.
Succession
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://imgur.com/fGYf0

Stuck on #3

Homework Equations



V = Vi + a*t
Y = (1/2)gt^2 + (ViY * t) + Yi

The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the vertical and horizontal components and the initial velocity.
ViX = 6.2
ViY = 9.922
Vi = 11.7
Yf = 0
Yi = 7
Xi = 0
X = ?
Vf = ?
a (acceleration of gravity) = 9.8
(i = initial, f = final)

Answers to # 1 and # 2 are 9.922 and 5.0227 respectively.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bump: Any help here?
 
Welcome to PF Succession!

Succession said:
Bump: Any help here?

Part 3 asks you to find the magnitude of the velocity at the end of travel, just before the object hits the ground. Well, what is the horizontal component of this velocity, at the end of the trip? Hint: do any forces act in the horizontal direction?

Okay, how about the vertical component of the velocity at the end of the trip? How would you find that? Hint: what height is it falling from? You know the "initial" velocity when it starts falling (i.e. at the point of max height), the acceleration, and the distance that it falls. Can you think of an equation that would allow you to solve for the final velocity (at the end of the fall) given those three things?
 
cepheid said:
Welcome to PF Succession!



Part 3 asks you to find the magnitude of the velocity at the end of travel, just before the object hits the ground. Well, what is the horizontal component of this velocity, at the end of the trip? Hint: do any forces act in the horizontal direction?

Okay, how about the vertical component of the velocity at the end of the trip? How would you find that? Hint: what height is it falling from? You know the "initial" velocity when it starts falling (i.e. at the point of max height), the acceleration, and the distance that it falls. Can you think of an equation that would allow you to solve for the final velocity (at the end of the fall) given those three things?

Well the horizontal component of the initial velocity is 6.2, as given. I found the time (t) to be 2.578866342. Then I found Vy using Vy= gt + Viy, Vy = -15.35081607. Then I plugged my answer into a^2 + b^2 = c^2, Vy^2 + Vx^2 = V^2. -15.35081607^2 + 6.2^2 = V^2.
ended with -16.55558981. answer is still counted as incorrect, not sure where I went wrong, as one of my classmates used this same process and walked me through it and he got the answer right.
 
Succession said:
Well the horizontal component of the initial velocity is 6.2, as given. I found the time (t) to be 2.578866342.

I'm not sure what time this is supposed to be, but if it is the time required to reach the max height (starting from the moment of launch), then it is wrong, and it is not the time required to fall back down to the ground either. EDIT: I see, it looks like that might be the sum of those two times. But you didn't need time at all. Since you solved for the height in part 2 (and by the way you need to add the 7 m to that answer) you could have just used the equation vf2 = vi2 + 2ad. This is what I was strongly hinting at with my previous post.

Succession said:
Then I found Vy using Vy= gt + Viy, Vy = -15.35081607. Then I plugged my answer into a^2 + b^2 = c^2, Vy^2 + Vx^2 = V^2. -15.35081607^2 + 6.2^2 = V^2.
ended with -16.55558981. answer is still counted as incorrect, not sure where I went wrong, as one of my classmates used this same process and walked me through it and he got the answer right.

When you arrive at an answer, always always ask, "does this actually make any sense?" The magnitude of something can never be negative. What's more you definitely shouldn't have gotten a negative answer using Pythagoras, because the square of any number is always positive.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top