2D momentum piece breaks problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter coldsteel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2d Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving momentum conservation after a piece of ice breaks into three parts. The larger piece, weighing 4 kg, moves downward at 4 m/s, while two smaller pieces of 2 kg each break off at 45-degree angles. Participants emphasize the need to calculate the x and y components of the smaller pieces' velocities to apply momentum conservation correctly. There is confusion regarding the initial equations used, with one participant criticizing the lack of clarity in the notation and suggesting that clearer variable definitions would aid understanding. Ultimately, the conversation highlights the importance of precise communication in solving physics problems effectively.
coldsteel
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1.A piece of ice falls on a frozen lake and breaks up into three pieces which go off in the directions shown in the diagram below. The mass of the bigger piece is 4 kg and it moves with a speed of 4 m/s straight down, If the two smaller pieces are 2 kg each and break off at 45 degrees each. What would be their speed right after the breakup?


icebreaks.jpg

2. momentum initial = momentum final.
Pi=Pf[
M*V+M*V=M*V+M*V



3. I think I need to find the x and y compenents of the smaller 2kg piece, but I don't know how to start because the bigger piece is at 90 degrees. this would make the x compenent 0 right? if i solve for the y direction... M*V+M*V=0 would I take half of the mass of the big ice chunk becuase it splits evenly? I used 4(2)+2(V)=0 to get a y compenent of 4. then use trig to get the vector velocity which I got to = 5.7 m/s. Is this right?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is impossible to understand what you mean because equations like M*V+M*V=M*V+M*V make no sense. They are the same as 1 = 1: always true, but carry no information whatsoever. M*V+M*V=0 is hardly better, because it means V = 0, which cannot be true in this case. Please use notation that let's other people understand what you are doing. You can denote the little piece's mass as m, their velocities as v, and those of the large piece M and V.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top