2nd order correction to gauge transformation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the second order correction to gauge transformations in the context of weak field approximations in general relativity. Participants explore the implications of coordinate transformations on the metric tensor and seek to understand the nature of higher order terms resulting from these transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the weak field approximation and describes how a coordinate transformation affects the metric perturbation, questioning the form of higher order terms.
  • Another participant suggests specific sections from literature that may provide additional insights into the topic.
  • A participant expresses that the suggested references did not clarify their query and questions the relevance of the Killing vector in this context.
  • A further contribution details the exact transformation applied to the metric and expands on the resulting terms, indicating a more complex relationship than initially presented.
  • Another participant points to a reference that discusses the subtleties of exact transformations and their implications for diffeomorphisms, suggesting a more advanced approach involving Lie derivatives.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are multiple competing views regarding the nature of higher order terms and the implications of the coordinate transformations discussed.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of transformations and the unresolved nature of the mathematical steps involved in deriving higher order terms.

matt91a
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
In the weak field approximation,

g_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}+h_{\mu\nu}

If we make a coordinate transformation of the form

x^{\mu&#039;}=x^{\mu}+\xi^{\mu}(x)[\itex]<br /> <br /> it changes h_{\mu\nu}[\itex] to&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; h&amp;amp;#039;_{\mu\nu}=h_{\mu\nu}+\xi_{\mu,\nu}+\xi_{\nu,\mu}+O(\xi^{2})[\itex]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; I was wondering if anyone could shed some light on what form the higher order terms take. I have an inkling it&amp;amp;#039;s terms from a taylor series expansion but I&amp;amp;#039;m not sure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for your reply but I'm afraid it doesn't shed any more light on it. I'm not sure if \xi^{\mu}(x)[\itex] being a Killing vector has anything to do with it.
 
The exact transformation is xμ = x'μ + ξμ. Applied to the metric this is

gμν = ∂xα/∂x'μ ∂xβ/∂x'ν gαβ

= (δαμ + ξα)(δβν + ξβ)(ηαβ + hαβ)

= ημν + (hμν + ξα hαν + ξβ hμβ + ξαξβhαβ)

= ημν + h'μν
 
A clear reference is http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9609040, although this is not that accessible to the beginner. One subtlety is that if you take the transformation x = x' + xi to be exact, then xi is no longer the generator of the diffeomorphism at higher than linear order. So most people use equation (1.1) of the above reference for the coordinate transformation. With that form you can express everything in terms of Lie derivatives, equation (1.3).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K