2nd Order Linear DE (homogeneous/wronskian/euler-cauchy)

  • Thread starter Thread starter anthony:)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    2nd order Linear
anthony:)
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The equation t^2y'' + 4ty' -4y = 0

has a solution of y(t) = t.

Find a second, linearly independent solution.

2. The attempt at a solution

Ok so I just applied the Cauchy Euler equation method to find a general solution of

y = c1*t^-4 + c2*t

Where c1 and c2 are constants.

The problem stated that t was already a solution so I'm assuming that t^-4 is the other solution.

To determine whether they were linearly independent, I found the Wronkian which was

-5t^-4

I know that two solutions of a DE are linearly independent if the wronkian is non-zero for all points where the solution space is defined, but in this case, the wronskian is only zero if t> 0 or t < 0. But it will be zero if t=0.

The problem does not include a range for t...

So basically, my question is : Could t^-4 be a second linearly independent solution of the DE?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi anthony:)! welcome to pf! :smile:

(use {} round an exponent or subscript if it's more than one character :wink:)
anthony:) said:
To determine whether they were linearly independent, I found the Wronkian which was

-5t^{-4}

I know that two solutions of a DE are linearly independent if the wronkian is non-zero for all points where the solution space is defined, but in this case, the wronskian is only zero if t> 0 or t < 0. But it will be zero if t=0. …

but y = t and y = t-4 are obviously independent!

i think you only need to look at the wronskian to check independence if you don't already know what the solutions are :wink:
 
Sorry I'm kind of slow...

Thanks
 
anthony:) said:
To determine whether they were linearly independent, I found the Wronkian which was

-5t^-4

I know that two solutions of a DE are linearly independent if the wronkian is non-zero for all points where the solution space is defined, but in this case, the wronskian is only zero if t> 0 or t < 0. But it will be zero if t=0.

The problem does not include a range for t...

You mean the Wronskian is non-zero if t > 0 or t < 0. And it is not zero when t = 0; it is undefined.

Also note that the leading coefficient of the DE is zero when t = 0. That gives a singular point at t = 0 which is why the domain for the solution doesn't include t = 0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top