An explosion breaks an object into two pieces

  • Thread starter Thread starter pupatel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
AI Thread Summary
An explosion divides an object into two pieces, with one piece having 1.5 times the mass of the other, releasing 7800 J of energy. The conservation of momentum leads to a relationship between their velocities, allowing the calculation of kinetic energy for each piece. The first piece's kinetic energy (KE1) is determined to be 3/4 of the total energy, while the second piece's kinetic energy (KE2) is 1/4 of the total. Participants in the discussion clarify calculations and correct errors in their approaches to the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful step-by-step verification in physics calculations.
pupatel
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Can someone help me with this...what is the answer to this and how do i get it? :eek:

An explosion breaks an object into two pieces, one of which has 1.5 times the mass of the other. If 7800 J were released in the explosion, how much kinetic energy did each piece acquire?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that since there are only two pieces, you can get by without explicit use of vectors for the momenta.

From the point of view of the center of mass, conservation of momentum implies

m1 v1 = m2 v2

or, substituting what you know about masses and taking m1 to be the lesser,

m1 v1 = 1.5 m1 v2

where I am letting each speed be a positive number, since I am not using vector language. You can divide that last equation through by m1 to get that v2 = (2/3) v1.

Kinetic energy, again from the center of mass point of view, is

(1/2) m1 v1^2 + (1/2) m2 v2^2 = 7800.

Subtituting again,

(1/2) m1 v1^2 + (1/2)(3/2) m1 [(2/3) v1]^2 = 7800,

which means

KE1 + (1/3) KE1 = 7800.

So KE1 = (3/4) 7800, and that means KE2 = (1/4) 7800. Take it from here with your calculator.
 
Last edited:
I agree with Janitor in almost everything; but I get: KE1+(2/3)KE1=Total energy => KE1=(3/5) of total energy.
 
Wisky40, I looked back through what I wrote and I can't find an error--but that doesn't mean I am correct! I would advise pupatel to go through each step on his/her own and not take anything for granted.
 
I think EK1(1+(3/2)(2/3)^2)=EK1(1+(2/3))=EK1(5/3).
 
Janitor said:
(1/2) m1 v1^2 + (1/2)(3/2) m1 [(2/3) v1]^2 = 7800,

which means

KE1 + (1/3) KE1 = 7800
No, it means KE1 + (2/3) KE1 = 7800. I suspect you multiplied 3/2 by (2/3)2 but then divided it by 2, which you shouldn't do because 1/2 is part of the KE expression.
 
Yep, that's what I did. You guys are completely correct. My mistake!
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
757
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
66
Views
20K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top