MHB *3 coordinates of parallelogram STUV

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the coordinates of point V in parallelogram STUV, given the coordinates of points S, T, and U. The vector from S to T is calculated as $\vec{ST} = \pmatrix{9 \\ 9}$, leading to the determination of V's coordinates as (-4, 6). The equation of line UV is established as $y = x + 10$, and the value of $\lambda$ is derived from the equations $x = -4 - 9\lambda$ and $y = 6 - 9\lambda$. Ultimately, the value of $\lambda$ is found to be $-\frac{5}{9}$.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
View attachment 1233

(a) $\vec{ST} = \pmatrix{9 \\ 9}$
so $V=(5,15)-(9,9)=(-4,6)$

(b) $UV = \pmatrix{-4,6}-\lambda \pmatrix{9,9}$

(c) eq of line $UV$ is $y=x+10$ so from position vector
$\pmatrix{1 \\11}$ we have $11=1+10$

didn't know how to find the value of $\lambda$

(d) ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have \displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -4 - 9\lambda \end{align*} and \displaystyle \begin{align*} y = 6 - 9\lambda \end{align*}, so surely if you have the point \displaystyle \begin{align*} (x, y) = (1, 11) \end{align*} you can find \displaystyle \begin{align*} \lambda \end{align*}...
 
For d) i), you can easily apply the distance formula in elementary geometry. You should get
$$\sqrt{(a-1)^2+(17-11)^2}=2\sqrt{13}$$
From that point it's just algebra.
For ii), use this formula involving vector dot products:
$$\theta_{ab}=\arccos\frac{a\cdot b}{\mid \mid a\mid \mid \mid \mid b\mid \mid }$$

(Bandit)
 
Last edited:
Hello, karush!

\text{20. Three of the coordinates of parallelogram }STUV
. . . .\text{are: }\:S(\text{-}2,\text{-}2),\:T(7,7),\:U(5,15)

\text{(a) Find the vector }\vec{ST}\text{ and hence the coordinates of }V.
The sketch locates point V.
Code:
                  |       (5,15)
                  |       U o
                  |       .   *
                  |     .       * (7.7)
                  |   .           o T
                  | .           * :
                  .           *   :
                . |         *     :
              .   |       *       :
            .     |     *         :-9
          .       |   *           :
      V o         | *             :
    ------.-------*---------------:----
            .   * |               :
            S o - | - - - - - - - *
           (-2,-2)|    -9
Going from T to S, we move down 9 and left 9.

Doing the same from U we arrive at V(-4,6).
 
soroban said:
Hello, karush!


The sketch locates point V.
Code:
                  |       (5,15)
                  |       U o
                  |       .   *
                  |     .       * (7.7)
                  |   .           o T
                  | .           * :
                  .           *   :
                . |         *     :
              .   |       *       :
            .     |     *         :-9
          .       |   *           :
      V o         | *             :
    ------.-------*---------------:----
            .   * |               :
            S o - | - - - - - - - *
           (-2,-2)|    -9
Going from T to S, we move down 9 and left 9.

Doing the same from U we arrive at V(-4,6).

As impressive as your coding skills are, I have to ask, didn't the OP already do all of this?
 
Prove It said:
You have \displaystyle \begin{align*} x = -4 - 9\lambda \end{align*} and \displaystyle \begin{align*} y = 6 - 9\lambda \end{align*}, so surely if you have the point \displaystyle \begin{align*} (x, y) = (1, 11) \end{align*} you can find \displaystyle \begin{align*} \lambda \end{align*}...

OK from this I get $$\lambda = -\frac{5}{9}$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top