3-dimensional potential energy problem

AI Thread Summary
The potential energy of a particle in the x-y plane is defined as P.E. = x^3 + 8x^2 + 34yz, and the force can be calculated by taking the negative gradient of this potential. To find the force components, the partial derivatives with respect to x, y, and z should be computed, with the understanding that if the particle is constrained to the x-y plane, the z component of the force will be zero. The discussion highlights the importance of treating y and z as constants when calculating the partial derivatives. The correct approach simplifies the force calculation significantly, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. Overall, the key takeaway is the application of partial derivatives to determine the force in a three-dimensional potential energy context.
winhog
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
I have a problem on my homework that says the potential energy of a particle is given by its position in the x-y plane according to

P.E. = x^3 + 8x^2 + 34yz

and I have to calculate the force on the particle at point (x,y,z), and all equilibrium points.

dU = 3x^2 dx + 16x dx + 34y dz + 34z dy

and F = -dU/dr with r being the vector position...

-F = 3x^2 dx/dr + 16x dx/dr + 34y dz/dr + 34z dy/dr

but that can't be the answer can it? I'm not given any dx/dr's or anything like that...I have a feeling there's some simple math thing I'm missing.

Any hints anyone can think of?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to find the gradient of the potential - it's a vector quantity!
 
Hmmm...I think my problem might be I've never learned how to take a vector derivative and this might be above my head mathematically :confused:

Maybe I can separate the potential energy into x and y components...but i really don't know how.

I guess since the particle is on the x-y plane, dz = 0...so my equation can be simplified to

F = (-3x^2 - 16x) dx/dr - 34z dy/dr .

Can I change dx/dr and dy/dr into (x-direction) and (y-direction) in terms of the force? Then use pythagorean theorem to find the total force? Am I just rambling?
 
It's really straightforward:

The x-component of the force is the partial derivative of the potential with respect to x. For the y-component use the partial wrt y and for the z-component use the partial wrt z. Voila!
 
Tide said:
It's really straightforward:

The x-component of the force is the partial derivative of the potential with respect to x. For the y-component use the partial wrt y and for the z-component use the partial wrt z. Voila!

One caveat: the force is MINUS the gradient of the potential, \vec F = - \vec \nabla V

or, to be more specific,

F_x = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial x}

F_y = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial y}

F_z = - {\partial V(x,y,z) \over \partial z}

If the particle is indeed constrained to the xy plane, then the z component of the force will be canceled by a normal force. In the x and y component, one must then set the value of z corresponding to the z plane one is in (z=0 or some other value).

Pat
 
nrqed,

Thanks - I meant to type "proportional to" but somehow it didn't come out!
 
If I take the derivative with respect to, say, x, can I assume y and z are constants? If so, I messed up on a pretty simple problem :blushing:
 
That's essentially what you do when you take partial derivatives which applies here.
 
Thanks for the help guys!
 
Back
Top