3 Phase Systems Theory and Procedure -- Determining Average Power

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the determination of average power in three-phase systems, specifically comparing different scenarios involving delta and wye configurations of impedances. Participants explore the procedures for calculating average power in these systems, addressing confusion regarding the use of line and phase voltages and impedances.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the steps for calculating average power in three different circuit scenarios, noting the differences in procedures for delta and wye configurations.
  • Another participant explains that in the first scenario, the delta impedance is converted to its star equivalent, affecting the calculation of average power.
  • There is a discussion about the conversion of line voltage to phase voltage, with one participant questioning the notation used for voltages in the problem statement.
  • Participants clarify that the second scenario does not require the impedance to be divided by three, as it is already in a star configuration, and that the absence of line impedance simplifies the calculation.
  • One participant mentions that the third scenario follows a general procedure applicable to balanced three-phase networks.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express some agreement on the procedures for calculating average power but also highlight confusion regarding the differences between the scenarios. There is no consensus on a single approach, as participants present varying interpretations of the problem statements and procedures.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential misunderstandings regarding the definitions of line and phase voltages, as well as the implications of different configurations on the calculations. Some assumptions about the problem statements remain unverified.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students studying electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on three-phase systems and power calculations.

OmniNewton
Messages
105
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Consider the 3 following Scenarios:
1.
upload_2016-12-7_17-12-31.png


2.
upload_2016-12-7_17-13-5.png

rms value of line voltage is 208 V

Three equal impedances, 60 +j30 W each, are delta-connected to a 230-V rms, three-phase circuit. Another three equal impedances, 40 +j10 W are wye-connected across the same circuit at the same points.

Homework Equations


S = 3|Ia|^2(Zy)
P = Real Component (S)

The Attempt at a Solution


How come when analyzing circuit one the procedure for determining the average power is to
1. find the line current Ia which is simply 110<0 divided by the impedance (Z(delta)/3 + 2)
2. calculate S = 3|Ia|^2(Zy) where Zy =(Z(delta)/3 + 2)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.

But when analyzing circuit 2 the procedure is:
1. Convert Van = 208 to Vp = 208/ root(3)
2. compute S by using S = (3 * Vp^2)/ (Zpcomplex conjugate)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.

And when analyzing circuit 3 the procedure is:
1. Find the line current
2. compute S by using S = (3 * Vs * (complex conjugate of line current)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.

Essentially I am kind of confused about what this Vp, Zp are that is used in the second consideration. Also why for every one of these scenarios the procedure for getting average power is different and the previous methods do not work. All of these examples seem the exact same is what really confuses me. What makes these 3 analyses different? How do I know what procedure to follow? I am doing self study so any help that can be provided is greatly appreciated.

Thank you in advanced!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
OmniNewton said:
How come when analyzing circuit one the procedure for determining the average power is to
1. find the line current Ia which is simply 110<0 divided by the impedance (Z(delta)/3 + 2)
2. calculate S = 3|Ia|^2(Zy) where Zy =(Z(delta)/3 + 2)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.
In this method, they have first converted the delta impedance into its star equivalent impedance and then Zstar=Zdelta/3 is used. Then of course the 2Ω line resistances come in series with the load impedances in the respective phases, so you see the term Z/3+2 ohm in the equation.
OmniNewton said:
Convert Van = 208 to Vp = 208/ root(3)
Van=Vphase and in star, Vph=Vline/√3. Are you sure the problem says Van=208 V?
OmniNewton said:
But when analyzing circuit 2 the procedure is:
1. Convert Van = 208 to Vp = 208/ root(3)
2. compute S by using S = (3 * Vp^2)/ (Zpcomplex conjugate)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.
You can use the procedure in circuit 1 for this circuit too. This is already in star configuration, so you need not divide the load impedance by 3 as you did for circuit 1. But here, you do not have any line impedance and hence, you do not have a "voltage-divider" in the line. So, instead of calculating the line current like in circuit 1, you can directly use the given voltage to find the power.
OmniNewton said:
And when analyzing circuit 3 the procedure is:
1. Find the line current
2. compute S by using S = (3 * Vs * (complex conjugate of line current)
3. take the real component of S and that is your average power.
This is the "general" procedure and can be applied to any balanced three phase network.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmniNewton
Oh I see thank you very kindly for taking the time to explain this. Yes problem 2 does say that the line voltage is that value.
 
Last edited:
OmniNewton said:
Yes problem 2 does say that the line voltage is that value.
That means Vab=208V, not Van as you have written.Van=208/root3 V.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K