Proving Convergence: Real s, 0<s<1, n \to \infty

  • Thread starter Thread starter disregardthat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convergence Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that n^s - (n-1)^s converges to zero as n approaches infinity for real s in the range 0 < s < 1. An elementary proof is sought, ideally using basic calculus concepts without advanced techniques. The mean value theorem is suggested as a method to demonstrate this convergence, leading to the expression s(n + ξ)^(s-1), which approaches zero. The graph of the function also provides an intuitive understanding of the limit. The proposed approach is recognized as an effective and straightforward proof.
disregardthat
Science Advisor
Messages
1,864
Reaction score
34
How can we prove that n^s-(n-1)^s converge to zero as n \to \infty where s as a real number satisfies 0&lt;s&lt;1?

I am specifically looking for a more or less elementary proof for this for real s. I think we can use the infinite binomial expansion, but I am looking for something that does not require more than elementary calculus.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I thought about the graph of that function and why the limit is "obvious" from the graph. Translating the graph picture into mathematics, I think an easy way is the mean value theorem.
With it you find
<br /> n^s-(n-1)^s=s(n+\xi)^{s-1}\to 0<br />
 
Gerenuk said:
I thought about the graph of that function and why the limit is "obvious" from the graph. Translating the graph picture into mathematics, I think an easy way is the mean value theorem.
With it you find
<br /> n^s-(n-1)^s=s(n+\xi)^{s-1}\to 0<br />

Excellent, nice and easy proof!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top