MHB -4.3.1 find quadratic eq given 3 pts

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quadratic
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
how do you find the quadratic equation given (-3,0) (3,0) and (0,-4)

thus y=k(x-3)(x+3) for the zero's but how do you find k or any other better method of finding the equation

thanks much(Cool)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
This can be done by looking at the general form of a quadratic equation: [math]y=ax^2+bx+c[/math]. We need to solve for a,b and c in order to write our equation and we have three points so we can do this through substitution. First use (0,-4) for (x,y) and you get [math]-4=a(0)^2+b(0)+c[/math] which means that c=-4. Now use the other two points the same way and you will have to solve a two variable system of equations for a and b. Once you have a,b and c you have your answer.
 
karush said:
how do you find the quadratic equation given (-3,0) (3,0) and (0,-4)

thus y=k(x-3)(x+3) for the zero's but how do you find k or any other better method of finding the equation
Starting from y=k(x-3)(x+3) (which gives the value 0 when x = 3 or –3), all you need to do is to put x=0 to see that y = –9k when x=0. But you want y to be –4 when x=0. Therefore –9k = –4. So k = 4/9, and $y = \frac49(x-3)(x+3).$
 
karush said:
how do you find the quadratic equation given (-3,0) (3,0) and (0,-4)

Another way (if you have covered the Lagrange Interpolation Polynomial):

$y=0L_1+0L_2-4L_3=-4\dfrac{(x+3)(x-3)}{(0+3)(0-3)}=\dfrac{4}{9}(x+3)(x-3)$
 
Fernando Revilla said:
Another way (if you have covered the Lagrange Interpolation Polynomial):

$y=0L_1+0L_2-4L_3=-4\dfrac{(x+3)(x-3)}{(0+3)(0-3)}=\dfrac{4}{9}(x+3)(x-3)$

no have not heard of it. looks valuable tho so will look it up thanks
 
$y = \dfrac{4}{9}(x-3)(x+3)$

ok I can't seem to write tikx to plot this

$\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.50]
%preamble \usepackage{pgfplots}
\begin{axis}[xmin=-3.5, xmax=3.5, ymin=-5, ymax=5, axis lines=middle, ticks=none]
\addplot[
draw = black, smooth, ultra thick,
domain=-4:4,
] {exp((4/9)*(x^2-9)}
foreach \x in {-3,3} { (axis cs:{\x},0) node[below left] {\x} };
\end{axis}
\end{tikzpicture}$
$$y = \dfrac{4}{9}(x-3)(x+3)$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top