4 Pole Induction Motor Working Principle

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the working principle of a 4-pole induction motor, particularly how it generates a rotating magnetic field similar to a 2-pole motor. The underlying physics remains consistent across different pole configurations, with variations primarily affecting torque and RPM characteristics. More poles result in smaller increments of rotor movement per cycle, while fewer poles allow for higher speeds but lower torque. The user seeks additional academic resources to better understand the 4-pole motor's operation. Overall, the principles of induction motor functionality remain unchanged despite the number of poles.
BlackMelon
Messages
43
Reaction score
7
Hello,

I am studying the working principle of an induction motor. The attachment below (link) is a portion from Stephen J. Chapman's textbook (page 160-169). He proved the theory of the rotating magnetic field so well for a 2-pole induction motor from 160 to 164. However, on page 166, the author proposed a 4-pole motor but did not provide the similar proof. I would like to know how this configuration forms a rotating magnetic field and makes the rotor (squirrel cage) rotate. Do you guys have any good papers for this?

https://www.mediafire.com/file/86a7...-2bh471C15I5A5Gi_YZx77Vy9g6jgxUTzcZuZAwiHQijI

Thank You
BlackMelon
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@BlackMelon the number of poles is just that aka the number of poles, the underlying physics of how the motor works doesn't change. The only thing that changes is the torque and RPM characteristic of the motor but the physics is the same, you still have a current that changes with time and drags the rotor along, only with more poles each set of coils drags the rotor a smaller distance.

Having less coil pairs/pole pairs means that each coil is located more degrees apart and each cycle drags the rotor for a longer distance.
This is why for a given fixed frequency fast RPM motors usually have less poles , as a consequence they also have less torque
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top