4-velocity, the mass shell and potential energy

pellman
Messages
683
Reaction score
6
4-velocity, the "mass shell" and potential energy

For a free relativistic particle we have the condition

E^2-\mathbf{p}^2c^2=m^2c^4.

putting p^0 = c^{-1}E we may write this as

p^\mu p_\mu = m^2c^2

And since p^\mu = m\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} = mu^\mu we may express the same condition as

u^\mu u_\mu = c^2

At least, this is true for a free particle. Is this condition affected by the presence of a potential?

In the presence of a potential A^\mu the momentum-energy relation becomes

(p^\mu-A^\mu)(p_\mu-A_\mu) = m^2c^2

doesn't it? But then in that case, we are talking about the canonical momentum and we no longer have p^\mu = mu^\mu. But is p^\mu = mu^\mu+A^\mu? So that we still have u^\mu u_\mu = c^2? Can't find this in my texts and just wanted someone to confirm I understand it correctly.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Always, u^\mu u_\mu = c^2. Mechanical momentum is m times that. Canonical momentum is determined from what the Lagrangian of the system is.
 
pellman said:
For a free relativistic particle we have the condition

E^2-\mathbf{p}^2c^2=m^2c^4.

putting p^0 = c^{-1}E we may write this as

p^\mu p_\mu = m^2c^2

And since p^\mu = m\frac{dx^\mu}{d\tau} = mu^\mu we may express the same condition as

u^\mu u_\mu = c^2

At least, this is true for a free particle. Is this condition affected by the presence of a potential?

In the presence of a potential A^\mu the momentum-energy relation becomes

(p^\mu-A^\mu)(p_\mu-A_\mu) = m^2c^2

doesn't it? But then in that case, we are talking about the canonical momentum and we no longer have p^\mu = mu^\mu. But is p^\mu = mu^\mu+A^\mu? So that we still have u^\mu u_\mu = c^2? Can't find this in my texts and just wanted someone to confirm I understand it correctly.

If you look in Jackson's text Classical Electrodynamics you will find something very close.

Pete
 
Thanks, guys.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
Back
Top