MHB 411.1.3.15 Prove A\cap(B/C)=(A\cap B)/(A\cap C)

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the set identity \(A \cap (B/C) = (A \cap B)/(A \cap C)\) and the properties of invertible mappings. A user seeks assistance in understanding these concepts before starting a class. Definitions of intersection and set difference are provided to clarify the proof for the set identity. Additionally, guidance is given on demonstrating that the inverse of the composition of two functions is equal to the composition of their inverses. The conversation emphasizes the need for a formal proof and analytical verification of the mappings.
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
$\tiny{411.1.3.15}$

$\text{15. Prove $A\cap(B/C)=(A\cap B)/(A\cap C)$}$
and
$\textsf{19. Let $f:A \to B$ and $g:B \to C$ be in invertable mappings;} \\
\text{that is, mappings such that $f^{-1}$ and $g^{-1}$ exist}\\
\text{Show that $\textit{$(g \, o \, f)^{-1}$}$}$

ok I am starting to do this and want to take a class in it starting 082018
so hope mhb can help me get a head start

text pdf is on pg15 #15 and #19
http://text:http://abstract.ups.edu/download/aata-20150812.pdf
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
karush said:
$\tiny{411.1.3.15}$

$\text{15. Prove $A\cap(B/C)=(A\cap B)/(A\cap C)$}$
and
$\textsf{19. Let $f:A \to B$ and $g:B \to C$ be in invertable mappings;} \\
\text{that is, mappings such that $f^{-1}$ and $g^{-1}$ exist}\\
\text{Show that $\textit{$(g \, o \, f)^{-1}$}$}$

ok I am starting to do this and want to take a class in it starting 082018
so hope mhb can help me get a head start

text pdf is on pg15 #15 and #19
http://text:http://abstract.ups.edu/download/aata-20150812.pdf

Hi karush,

For 15., consider the following definitions:

\(A\cap B = \{x\mid x\in A\wedge x\in B\}\)

\(A\setminus B = \{x\mid x\in A \wedge x\notin B\}\)

It follows that

\(\begin{aligned}A\cap(B\setminus C) &= \{x\mid x\in A\wedge(x\in B \wedge x\notin C)\}\\ &= \{x\mid (x\in A\wedge x\in B)\wedge (x\in A\wedge x\notin C)\}\\ &=\{x\mid (x\in A\cap B)\wedge (x\notin A\cap C)\}\\ &= (A\cap B)\setminus (A\cap C)\end{aligned}\)

You might need to be more formal with your proof, but this should give you enough of an idea as to how to construct a formal proof of this set identity.

For 19., we note that \(f:A\rightarrow B\) and \(g:B\rightarrow C\); Hence \(g\circ f:A\rightarrow C\). To show that \((g\circ f)^{-1}= f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}\), you want to show:
  1. that for any \(c\in C\), \(((g\circ f)\circ(f^{-1}\circ g^{-1}))(c) = c\), and
  2. that for any \(a\in A\), \(((f^{-1}\circ g^{-1})\circ (g\circ f))(a) = a\).
I leave it for you to verify this analytically.

I hope this helps!
 
thanks
much appreciate all that

kinda by myself with this right now class hasn't started yet
gota catch bus now
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top