5^(n+1) - 1 = 4*5^n + 5^n -1 ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bkc82
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation 5^(n+1) - 1 = 4*5^n + 5^n - 1 is discussed in terms of understanding the relationship between the terms. The law of exponents is highlighted as crucial for simplifying expressions, specifically X^a * X^b = X^(a+b). The confusion arises regarding the coefficient "4" in the equation, which some participants find arbitrary. It is noted that 5^(n+1) can be expressed as 5*5^n, and alternative breakdowns of the equation are proposed to illustrate the equivalence. The discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical expressions and the potential for misunderstanding.
bkc82
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
5^(n+1) - 1 = 4*5^n + 5^n -1 ??

This is what my book says but it does not show the math in between the steps so i can't seem to grasp it. Anyone want to show me how they are equal?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You got to look at the law of exponents: X^a*X^b=X^{a+b}. This comes about because, say X^4*X^2=(XXXX)(XX)=X^6.

See: http://www.gomath.com/htdocs/lesson/exponent_lesson1.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I understand that part but where does the four come from?
 
The 4 seems arbitrary to me but it works as long as you have the 1 coefficient of the other 5^n term. Here's what I mean

5^(n+1) = 5*5^n yes?
This also equals

4*5^n + 1*5^n

or 3*5^n + 2*5^n

It's not there for any reason other than to confuzzle you from what I see.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top