5-suit Texas Hold 'Em: ace high beats one pair

  • Thread starter Thread starter ACG
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Pair
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around adapting Texas Hold 'Em using a Five Crowns deck, which features 55 cards across five suits, with 3 as the lowest and King as the highest. The absence of Aces in this deck raises questions about hand rankings, particularly the assertion that Ace High beats One Pair. Participants suggest modifying the deck to include Aces and 2s to restore traditional poker hand rankings, emphasizing that without these cards, the game may not resemble classic Hold 'Em. The conversation also touches on the implications of hand probabilities, noting that the odds for various hands differ significantly from standard poker. Suggestions are made to explore how these changes could affect gameplay dynamics, especially in smaller player groups, and the importance of understanding the odds when transitioning back to traditional poker.
ACG
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
This isn't really a brain teaser as much as a game.

I have a Five Crowns deck at home. This consists of a deck of 55 cards (well, two decks of cards) with five suits. 3 is lowest and King is highest. You can't do 3-King in a straight.

There are jokers, but I'm not using them -- they make the odds too intractable.

What do you think Texas Hold 'Em would be like with this deck? I can already tell you, Ace High beats One Pair. Imagine making a pair on the river and your hand deteriorates!

Here are the number of possible hands of a given type as I see them. The major change is the Ace High beating one pair.

ONE PAIR: 1,650,000
ACE HIGH/ZERO PAIR: 1,425,425
TWO PAIR: 247,500
THREE OF A KIND: 123,750
STRAIGHT: 21,840
FULL HOUSE: 5,500
FOUR OF A KIND: 2,750
FLUSH: 2,130
STRAIGHT FLUSH: 30
FIVE OF A KIND: 11
ROYAL FLUSH: 5

What do you think?

ACG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What Ace high? There are no Aces in this deck.
I assume you mean King high?

How about re-marking some of the cards in the extra deck (double deck)
to get back the Aces and 2's for a full 13 ranks with the five suits.
Sixty-five cards instead of 52 or 55.

It won't look like "Hold-em" without Ace's & 2's - not that having "Star" suit will look normal.
But it may mean better chances of three of a kind, mak'n a boat etc. to give the play more action when only playing with thre or four people. Hold-em needs 7 or 8. That kind of action might be helpful while learning to buff & play the players etc. Compare the odds see what you think. Just be tuned into the odds change when going back to the real game.

Let us know how it plays - seems like it might help in learning.

Notes:
2,A,K,Q,J doesn't make a straight in the real game either.

Also vs. a pair, it's harder to get Ace high or less in real 7 card game too, but it's still a lower (losing) hand.

Check your odds calculations, flush odds should still be back near the straight odds.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top