500amps in parallel wires -resistance change?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of direct current running in parallel wires on the apparent resistance of a system, particularly in the context of electroforming equipment. Participants explore the implications of wire proximity, current direction, and potential magnetic field interactions on voltage and resistance changes after relocating the equipment.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether direct current running in opposite directions in parallel wires can increase the apparent resistance, noting a voltage increase from 16 volts to 22 volts after relocating the equipment.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on whether the current is smooth DC or rough rectified AC, suggesting that the nature of the current could impact the discussion.
  • It is noted that the inductance of the cable length may have increased due to proximity, potentially affecting voltage loss, although some argue that inductance does not contribute to DC voltage drops.
  • One participant mentions that if the cables are in a conduit, they may get warmer, which could increase resistance, and provides a calculation for voltage drop based on the resistance of 4/0 copper wire.
  • Another participant speculates that the current density across each conductor may not be uniform at high current levels, which could effectively increase resistance.
  • Some participants introduce the concept of magnetoresistance, suggesting that the magnetic fields created by the wires could increase resistance due to collisions between charge carriers.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about magnetoresistance being the issue, citing experience with higher currents in copper cables under strong magnetic fields.
  • A question is raised about whether the conduit is made of a conducting material, which could influence the effects of any AC component present.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the factors affecting resistance and voltage drop, with no consensus reached on the primary cause of the observed changes. Some support the idea of magnetoresistance, while others challenge its relevance in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various assumptions about the nature of the current, the configuration of the wires, and the properties of the conduit, which may affect the discussion but remain unresolved.

mjune
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Can direct current running in opposite directions in parallel wires increase the apparent resistance of a system? This is a real life problem that I’ve noticed on some electroforming equipment we relocated.

Prior to the move the wires were separate. Now they are located in a conduit together.

Using 500amps in two 4/0 cables per polarity running 70 feet in the conduit. 4/0 (or 0000 gauge) is a stranded 0.460” copper conductor with ~0.73” outer diameter with the insulation.

Before the equipment move the system ran at about 16 volts. After the move it is running at about 22 volts.

Can the magnetic fields created by the wires be interfering with the current flow?

If there is an effect, how can it be calculated?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mjune! http://img96.imageshack.us/img96/5725/red5e5etimes5e5e45e5e25.gif

Is this smooth DC, or just rough raw rectified AC? :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
DC is from welding power supplies. There is a possibility that there is some AC signal... but typically when this happens that electroforming operation has issues.
 
The inductance of that length of cable has been increased with the proximity of the cables, so with current not smooth, the reactance has higher voltage loss.
 
NascentOxygen said:
The inductance of that length of cable has been increased with the proximity of the cables, so with current not smooth, the reactance has higher voltage loss.
The inductance between the two parallel cables decreases as they get closer together. Also, inductance is not a contributing factor in dc voltage drops. From Smythe, Static and Dynamic Electricity, 3rd Edition, page 440:
L=\frac{\mu_{o}}{\pi}\cosh^{-1}\left(\frac{b}{d} \right) \text{ Henrys}
where d is diameter of cable and b is separation (This does not include the additional internal inductance inside each cable.).
If the cables are confined to a cable conduit, they probably will get warmer, and their resistance goes up. The 4/0 copper wire resistance is about 0.05 ohms per 1000 feet at room temperature, so 500 amps dc flowing 140 feet implies a 3.5 volt drop.
 
Bob S said:
The inductance between the two parallel cables decreases as they get closer together.
That's a good point you raise. Reactance would decrease, not increase.
If the cables are confined to a cable conduit, they probably will get warmer, and their resistance goes up. The 4/0 copper wire resistance is about 0.05 ohms per 1000 feet at room temperature, so 500 amps dc flowing 140 feet implies a 3.5 volt drop.
OP may have an opportunity to confirm this at switch-on after a prolonged off time. Is the voltage seen to creep up by 3 or 4 volts over a period of minutes?

Another factor at such high current levels, in close proximity the current density across each conductor may not be uniform, effectively reducing the cross-sectional area of the conductors and increasing the resistance seen.
 
We know that current flowing in the same direction in two parallel conductors results in attraction, and the converse, when flowing in opposite directions, the conductors will repel. From this I speculate that the increased voltage drop (increased resistance) may be caused by magnetoresistance...just as the OP suggested. I found this:

“Resistance is caused by collisions between charge carriers (like electrons) and other carriers or atoms. An electron moving through a perfect crystal of metal at a temperature of absolute zero will experience no collisions, so the crystal would have zero resistance. Imperfections, however, do exist, and temperatures above absolute zero cause the atoms to vibrate out of their lattice locations. These vibrations and imperfections cause collisions, increasing the resistance of the crystal.

Applying a magnetic field can also increase the resistance of a material, since the magnetic force on the moving charges will tend to increase the number of collisions between charges. This dependence of resistance on magnetic field is called magnetoresistance. Magnetoresistance is proportional to the strength of the magnetic field, with a larger field producing a higher resistance.

1. The force on a current-carrying wire in a perpendicular magnetic field is due to the force on the charge carriers moving through the wire.
2. This force on the charge carriers produces an increased resistance as the charge carriers collide more with atoms in the wire. This phenomenon is called magnetoresistance.
3. As charge carriers (electrons) collide with atoms in a metal, the deflection of each charge (and thus the resistance in the metal) depends on the spin of the electron.
4. The spin-dependent scattering (and thus the resistance) will increase if adjacent magnetic domains are aligned in opposite directions. This occurs in the absence of an external magnetic field.
5. The spin-dependent scattering (and thus the resistance) is smallest if the magnetic field through which the charges pass all points in the same direction, which is accomplished by the external magnetic field of a bit.
6. This spin-dependent effect is much stronger than the effect of regular magnetoresistance, and so is called giant magnetoresistance. It is, however, a completely different effect.”

http://www.rpi.edu/dept/phys/ScIT/InformationStorage/magres/magnetism_b.html
 
Last edited:
Bobbywhy said:
I speculate that the increased voltage drop (increased resistance) may be caused by magnetoresistance...just as the OP suggested. I found this:
Thank you for presenting these details. Magnetoresistance could indeed provide an explanation, though without the opportunity to investigate we're unlikely to be able to apportion degree of responsibility to one cause or another.
 
NascentOxygen said:
Thank you for presenting these details. Magnetoresistance could indeed provide an explanation, though without the opportunity to investigate we're unlikely to be able to apportion degree of responsibility to one cause or another.
Magnetoresistance is not the problem. I have run higher currents in copper cables in very high magnetic fields.
 
  • #10
Is the conduit made of a conducting material? That will make a big difference if there's enough AC component on top of the DC.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K