How Does Lienard-Wiechert Potential Explain Electromagnetic Fields?

  • Thread starter Thread starter QuArK21343
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential
AI Thread Summary
The Lienard-Wiechert potential provides a framework for calculating electromagnetic fields generated by moving charges, expressed through scalar and vector potentials. The scalar potential is defined by a specific equation that incorporates retarded time, which is crucial for accurately determining the fields at a given position and time. To derive the electric and magnetic fields, one must evaluate the gradient of the retarded time, leading to a specific expression for the gradient. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the four-dimensional form of the potential and the covariant retarded Green's function to simplify calculations. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately modeling the behavior of electromagnetic fields around moving charges.
QuArK21343
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
Just to remind you, the Lienard-Wiechert potential, as far as the scalar potential is concerned, is:

\phi(\textbf{r},t)=\frac{q}{|\textbf r-\textbf r'(t')|\left(1-\frac{v'(t')\cdot \textbf{u}}{c}\right)}

, where \textbf u is the unit vector in the direction of \textbf r-\textbf r'. This equation gives the scalar potential at position \textbf{r} and at time t (the prime indicates that those quantities are to be evaluated at the retarded time). From here, and the similar expression for the vector potential, we can derive the electric and magnetic fields. To do so, we need to evaluate the gradient of t' where:

t'=t-\frac{|\textbf r-\textbf r'|}{c}

This i can't do; in fact, I don't understand with respect to what I have to take the gradient. Answer should be:

grad (t')=\frac{-\textbf u}{c-\textbf v'\cdot \textbf u}

Any help is much appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess, what you need is the gradient of the retarded time t' wrt. \vec{x} at t=\text{const} since this is what is needed to obtain the electromagnetic field,

F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_{\mu} A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}.

This is somewhat tedious. I'd rather keep the four-dimensional form of the potential written in terms of the covariant retarded Green's function

A^{\mu}(x)=\int \mathrm{d}^4 x \Delta_{\text{ret}}(x-x') j^{\mu}(x')

with (in Heaviside-Lorentz units and c=1)

\Delta_{\text{ret}}(x-x')=\frac{1}{4 \pi} \delta \left [t'-(t-|\vec{r}-\vec{r}'|)\right ].

For the four-current density of a particle with charge, q, you have

(j^{\mu}(x))=\begin{pmatrix}<br /> q \delta^{(3)}[\vec{x}-\vec{y}(t)] \\<br /> q \frac{\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm d t} \vec{y}(t) \delta^{(3)}[\vec{x}-\vec{y}(t)]<br /> \end{pmatrix},<br />

where \vec{y}(t) is the trajectory of the particle is function of the coordinate time, t.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top