Difference Between Tunneling and Hopping: Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter citw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tunneling
citw
Messages
70
Reaction score
0
In my research, I've always seen variable range and nearest neighbor hopping referred to as tunneling processes. However, I've also read papers that differentiate tunneling and hopping as two different transport mechanisms. Can someone clear this up for me? Given the context, what exactly is the difference between hopping and tunneling?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In hopping, the hopping particle has to have energy greater than or equal to that of the height of the barrier in order to cross the barrier, in tunnling it can cross the barrier even with energy less than the height of the barrier.

Examples: A heavy ion (let's say anthing heavier than Lithium) usually "hops" from one site to the next in the lattice during diffusion.
On the other hand interstitial proton in proton conductor can "tunnel" through the barrier and also can hop "above" it.

A celebrated example from nuclear physics is the "tunneling" of the alpha particle through the coulombic barrier during alpha decay.
 
Useful nucleus said:
In hopping, the hopping particle has to have energy greater than or equal to that of the height of the barrier in order to cross the barrier, in tunnling it can cross the barrier even with energy less than the height of the barrier.

This is an interesting interpretation. I don't think I've heard it expressed this way before.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top