7.0 earthquake hits Christchurch, New Zealand

  • Thread starter Thread starter jtbell
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earthquake
AI Thread Summary
A 7.0 earthquake struck Christchurch, New Zealand, causing significant infrastructure damage but, remarkably, no fatalities. The quake led to major disruptions, including compromised municipal water systems and reports of minor looting. Residents experienced continuous aftershocks, with many expressing relief that their homes remained intact despite the severity of the event. The city had been preparing for such disasters, which likely mitigated the impact. Overall, the community's response has been disciplined, and the civil defense measures proved effective in managing the crisis.
  • #51
Astronuc said:
I'm still waiting to hear from folks there. :frown:

The damage this time was much worse than the mag 7 last year.
Saturday, September 04, 2010 at 04:35:46 AM at epicenter
45 km (30 miles) W of Christchurch, New Zealand


The current one hit Tuesday, February 22, 2011 at 12:51:43 PM at epicenter
NEAR Christchurch, New Zealand (just 6 mi (10 km) SE of city) toward Lyttelton

1g of acceleration is considered very significant. Pages Road Pumping Station was near 2g!

Figure shows the ground acceleration. The red squares mean the most severe damage to structures.
http://www.geonet.org.nz/var/storage/images/media/images/news/2011/lyttelton_pga/57159-1-eng-GB/lyttelton_pga.png

When you hear, please let us know... This is very worrying.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #52
Hmmmm, didn't notice this thread picked up again for the recent earthquake. When I read about the quake this morning I remembered the thread from before and PM'd apeiron... no response yet, no ones heard anything huh?
 
  • #53
zomgwtf said:
Hmmmm, didn't notice this thread picked up again for the recent earthquake. When I read about the quake this morning I remembered the thread from before and PM'd apeiron... no response yet, no ones heard anything huh?

No... [URL]http://www.planetsmilies.com/smilies/sad/sad0020.gif[/URL]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #54
I imagine there are power outages and getting on PF is probably low on the importance scale. Hopefully he and his family are ok.
 
  • #55
Evo said:
I imagine there are power outages and getting on PF is probably low on the importance scale. Hopefully he and his family are ok.

80% of the place is without power. Many large buildings damaged, teetering on collapse. 75 confirmed dead, 300 missing. The city is being closed down for the next 3 days at least.

You're right, getting on an internet forum would be a low priority in such circumstances. Let's hope it's that.
 
  • #56
http://news.yahoo.com/video/world-15749633/24270574

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20110223/ap_on_bi_ge/as_new_zealand_earthquake

It's pretty bad.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #57
Evo said:
I imagine there are power outages and getting on PF is probably low on the importance scale. Hopefully he and his family are ok.

I know... it's just worry... if I were there and whole, I'd be trying to help people out of the rubble, not getting on PF.

Still... apeiron isn't my only friend there (just not an online friend). It's never a good feeling to know that we can't expect word soon.
 
  • #58
Thanks for people's concerns. Power has been off so no net access. Plus there is stuff to do. :smile:

Summary is me and mine are basically fine, there will be a few hundred dead, which looking around at the buildings that went, could be considered lucky, and rebuilding sewers, economy, homes, will be something we are still talking about in 5, probably 10 years.

It was incredibly bad luck to get a second shallower and almost right under the city. A mag 6 was expected following a mag 7, the hope was that it would be further away.

Here is the quick update I've been sending friends.

-------------------------

Hi - Family, house and cats all fine. We are in the lucky part of town where the damage is the least. We have water but not yet power. No visible damage at all really in our suburb. But a lot of the town is properly devastated this time round.

I was in the central city at the time and we had one person killed, several trapped, as a fair bit of our historic building collapsed. I was under a desk watching bits of ceiling fall in and bricks from the top floor rain down.

Sandy was at her clinic across town and her problem was that pipes broke, ground liquified, so in minutes her car was swamped and had to be abandoned. She got a lift home from a bus driver who abandoned his route to bring her to the door.

Kids were just finishing lunchbreak, so were safely outside.

The problems now are lack of power (so we have been out of communication with the world - I am typing this from our printing press on the outskirts of town where I can get a powerpoint and internet connection). The sewers are stuffed, so we shouldn't be using toilets (but with water going, most people still are). We have not had to go down to shops as we have a freezer of stuff going off, plus a vast supply of pasta/tinned tomatoes and other earthquake basics. But actually, food and fuel can get into Christchurch pretty easily, so no fear there.

Law and order not a problem, and everyone is helping neighbours. We have been looking after the oldies down our street, who need reassurance as much as anything.

Longer term, the town is looking to be in for a very hard time economically as the central business district looks inoperable for months and the fixing of roads, sewers, electricity will take years (they will be patched up in weeks, but rebuilding will go on a long time).

----------------------
 
  • #59
It must have been terrifying! So glad that you and your family are ok. Do they have an estimate of when you might get power?
 
  • #60
apeiron, glad to hear that you and yours are OK.

When I saw the fist images of the pancaked buildings and collapsed walls, my first thought was that deaths would probably total in the low thousands, not the hundreds. I'm very happy to be wrong on that count.
 
  • #61
apeiron said:
Thanks for people's concerns. Power has been off so no net access. Plus there is stuff to do. :smile:

Summary is me and mine are basically fine, there will be a few hundred dead, which looking around at the buildings that went, could be considered lucky, and rebuilding sewers, economy, homes, will be something we are still talking about in 5, probably 10 years.

It was incredibly bad luck to get a second shallower and almost right under the city. A mag 6 was expected following a mag 7, the hope was that it would be further away.

Here is the quick update I've been sending friends.

-------------------------

Hi - Family, house and cats all fine. We are in the lucky part of town where the damage is the least. We have water but not yet power. No visible damage at all really in our suburb. But a lot of the town is properly devastated this time round.

I was in the central city at the time and we had one person killed, several trapped, as a fair bit of our historic building collapsed. I was under a desk watching bits of ceiling fall in and bricks from the top floor rain down.

Sandy was at her clinic across town and her problem was that pipes broke, ground liquified, so in minutes her car was swamped and had to be abandoned. She got a lift home from a bus driver who abandoned his route to bring her to the door.

Kids were just finishing lunchbreak, so were safely outside.

The problems now are lack of power (so we have been out of communication with the world - I am typing this from our printing press on the outskirts of town where I can get a powerpoint and internet connection). The sewers are stuffed, so we shouldn't be using toilets (but with water going, most people still are). We have not had to go down to shops as we have a freezer of stuff going off, plus a vast supply of pasta/tinned tomatoes and other earthquake basics. But actually, food and fuel can get into Christchurch pretty easily, so no fear there.

Law and order not a problem, and everyone is helping neighbours. We have been looking after the oldies down our street, who need reassurance as much as anything.

Longer term, the town is looking to be in for a very hard time economically as the central business district looks inoperable for months and the fixing of roads, sewers, electricity will take years (they will be patched up in weeks, but rebuilding will go on a long time).

----------------------

Phew... I'm glad you and all are well, I'm sorry about everything else though.
 
  • #62
turbo-1 said:
apeiron, glad to hear that you and yours are OK.

When I saw the fist images of the pancaked buildings and collapsed walls, my first thought was that deaths would probably total in the low thousands, not the hundreds. I'm very happy to be wrong on that count.

News is coming out that you might be right... I'm very glad to have heard from apeiron given that news.

CNN-"Death toll expected to rise sharply"
 
  • #63
turbo-1 said:
apeiron, glad to hear that you and yours are OK.

When I saw the fist images of the pancaked buildings and collapsed walls, my first thought was that deaths would probably total in the low thousands, not the hundreds. I'm very happy to be wrong on that count.

Yeah, the TV cameras pick out the worst. Two tall buildings did collapse dramatically. Possibly due to lateral spreading as liquified land slumped towards the river. A lot of frontages fell down, squashing buses and people, but building codes mean that most places were wrecked yet not collapsed. People could get out.

The serious stuff is what earthquakes do to services underground. Pretty much a whole town sewer and water system to be dug out and relaid.

@ evo: not so much terrifying as just really annoying. The town was well along in its recovery from the first quake. So a second hit is psychologically a big drain.
 
  • #64
apeiron said:
Yeah, the TV cameras pick out the worst. Two tall buildings did collapse dramatically. Possibly due to lateral spreading as liquified land slumped towards the river. A lot of frontages fell down, squashing buses and people, but building codes mean that most places were wrecked yet not collapsed. People could get out.

The serious stuff is what earthquakes do to services underground. Pretty much a whole town sewer and water system to be dug out and relaid.

@ evo: not so much terrifying as just really annoying. The town was well along in its recovery from the first quake. So a second hit is psychologically a big drain.

That's for the future, for now the best thing is to aknowledge that future, but live in the moment. It may be that there is some good to come of this; in fact one theory is that these multiple quakes are taking the place of a "Big One".
 
  • #65
The Pyne Gould Guinness Building, a multi-storey building containing more than 200 workers, has collapsed and an unknown number of people are trapped inside.
That was half-collapsed.

The CTV building completely collapsed.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8340203/Christchurch-earthquake-destruction-seen-from-the-air.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/8339930/Powerful-earthquake-devastates-Christchurch.html
 
  • #66
nismaratwork said:
That's for the future, for now the best thing is to aknowledge that future, but live in the moment. It may be that there is some good to come of this; in fact one theory is that these multiple quakes are taking the place of a "Big One".

Wrong theory. The Alpine fault where the plates actually grind past each other is still waiting to go (about once every 600 years). These are just lateral faults that run all the way up the eastern coastline. The alpine would be 8+. And about as damaging as current quakes here, because it would be over 100km away. But bad for other cities and towns right in the path.

Many cities have rebuilt quite well out of quakes, so the 20 year view is more optimistic. At least now we can say that two of our big local faults have gone and it should take another 20,000 years or so for them to reload. It seems unlikely there can be more lurking so close to town. But hopefully we will be doing full seismic surveys to discover that.
 
  • #67
Yay...so good to hear from you, apeiron! Glad everything is well with your family and cats.
 
  • #68
lisab said:
Yay...so good to hear from you, apeiron! Glad everything is well with your family and cats.

The cats are now happy in the sunshine. Power is back on but they are getting fat on defrosting scallops and prawns that would otherwise go in the bin.

Whoops, just then another aftershock. One thing the news never explains is that we were still getting little bumps several times a day five months after the first quake.

Someone put together this time lapse animation of the many thousands we've had.

http://www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/
 
  • #69
It's good to hear from you and your cats again :smile:
 
  • #70
apeiron said:
The cats are now happy in the sunshine. Power is back on but they are getting fat on defrosting scallops and prawns that would otherwise go in the bin.

Whoops, just then another aftershock. One thing the news never explains is that we were still getting little bumps several times a day five months after the first quake.

Someone put together this time lapse animation of the many thousands we've had.

http://www.christchurchquakemap.co.nz/

Wow, that's an interesting animation. I didn't look at all of it but it seemed unusually quiet before Tuesday's big one.
 
  • #71
It is important to pay attention to activity in the region encompassing Vanuatu, Fiji, Tonga, Kermadec Islands as well as NZ. They are part of the same system.

Seismic activity around Christchurch. The Canterbury area is an outlier for big ones.
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_b0001iiu_l.html
http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/bulletin/neic_b0001iiu_h.html

Also pay attention to changes under Akaroa and Lyttelton.

The activity under Lyttelton is interesting. It stopped abruptly. Correction: it's filtered for > 4mag
Code:
         UTC DATE-TIME        LAT    LON
MAG     y/ m/d   h: m:s       deg    deg    DEPTH km    
4.2  2011/02/22 17:00:19   -43.613 172.814   8.4  
4.0  2011/02/22 14:30:13   -43.634 172.819  13.4  
4.3  2011/02/22 14:04:36   -43.614 172.875  10.0  
4.5  2011/02/22 11:02:16   -43.548 172.779   5.0  
4.8  2011/02/22 08:21:06   -43.599 172.560   6.9  
4.5  2011/02/22 06:43:30   -43.593 172.859   5.0  
4.4  2011/02/22 06:28:31   -43.590 172.710   5.0  
4.3  2011/02/22 05:59:35   -43.640 172.770   5.0  
4.1  2011/02/22 04:19:05   -43.600 172.750  15.0  
4.4  2011/02/22 03:04:09   -43.570 172.650  12.0  
5.5  2011/02/22 01:50:29   -43.588 172.734   9.6  
5.6  2011/02/22 00:04:18   -43.580 172.798   6.7  
6.3  2011/02/21 23:51:43   -43.600 172.710   5.0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #72
apeiron said:
Wrong theory. The Alpine fault where the plates actually grind past each other is still waiting to go (about once every 600 years). These are just lateral faults that run all the way up the eastern coastline. The alpine would be 8+. And about as damaging as current quakes here, because it would be over 100km away. But bad for other cities and towns right in the path.

Many cities have rebuilt quite well out of quakes, so the 20 year view is more optimistic. At least now we can say that two of our big local faults have gone and it should take another 20,000 years or so for them to reload. It seems unlikely there can be more lurking so close to town. But hopefully we will be doing full seismic surveys to discover that.

I admit, I was reaching... you're too smart for your own good and comfort! :wink:

Again, I'm very glad you and your's well.
 
  • #73
Good to hear apeiron, apeiron's family and cats, and Dadface's family are safe.
 
  • #74
Wow, glad to hear that you survived (with just a scare) and everyone in your family including your pets are safe, I lived through 2 quakes in San Diego in the late 70's and early 80's. They are disconcerting and frightening to say the least. Has the damage affected your ability to get to and from work, and your work place, at least for the short term ?

Rhody...
 
  • #75
apeiron, good to hear everyone is ok.
 
  • #76
rhody said:
Has the damage affected your ability to get to and from work, and your work place, at least for the short term ?

My workplace is semi-collapsed and will be demolished I'm sure. Ironically, we were due to move into a brand new building next week. That survives but with many windows gone and other damage. Besides, central city will be out of bounds for a month I would say.

We have a 20 story hotel that is leaning into a hole that opened up under a corner. That has to come down somehow. Whole city blocks will be bulldozed.

But I write for the city paper. And we got an edition out the next morning. You'd be surprised at how people can cope. Especially with all the help that comes in from outside.
 
  • #78
apeiron said:
My workplace is semi-collapsed and will be demolished I'm sure. Ironically, we were due to move into a brand new building next week. That survives but with many windows gone and other damage. Besides, central city will be out of bounds for a month I would say.

We have a 20 story hotel that is leaning into a hole that opened up under a corner. That has to come down somehow. Whole city blocks will be bulldozed.

But I write for the city paper. And we got an edition out the next morning. You'd be surprised at how people can cope. Especially with all the help that comes in from outside.

Wow, I can't even imagine what that must be like! It could take many years to recover, from the sounds of it.
 
  • #79
I finally got word from a relative. Ironically, their house was being inspected by a representative from the Earthquake Commission when the earthquake struck. They live near Lyttleton. Needless to say, they have more damage.

They are visiting family up north and will be back early next week to help with ongoing efforts.


Someone snapped this picture seconds after the earthquake
http://www.redditpics.com/christchurch-panorama-seconds-after-earthquake,11249/

At least 1/3, and maybe up to 2/3, of the buildings in the central business district are damaged.
http://www.3news.co.nz/Christchurchs-heart-ripped-to-bits/tabid/369/articleID/200008/Default.aspx



A close friend has family in CC. Everyone is OK.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #80
Good to hear your rellatives and your friend's rellatives are ok. I'm sorry to hear of all the damage, of course.
 
  • #81
aperion,
My workplace is semi-collapsed and will be demolished I'm sure. Ironically, we were due to move into a brand new building next week. That survives but with many windows gone and other damage. Besides, central city will be out of bounds for a month I would say.

I just looked at a few of Astronuc's links, the heart of the quake was essentially right under the center of downtown ? Holy ..., it sounds like you sort of lucked out, as you mention moving to a brand new work place next week. I am sure it is very unsettling. I only speak for myself, but you seem to be holding up remarkably well considering all you and you family and community have been through. I don't know what else to say except that in print on PF you seem remarkably calm and composed, if it were me, I assure you that would not be the case.

Rhody... o:)
 
  • #82
I heard one official mention the cost of rebuilding the infrastructure being as much as $30 billion.

There is a picture that shows the distribution of earthquakes before and since Feb 22. Clearly the earthquake occurences have been shifting eastward (and westward) during the last several months.
http://www.geonet.org.nz/news/feb-2011-christchurch-badly-damaged-by-magnitude-6-3-earthquake.html

The acceleration at one station was revised to 2.2g, which is a very significant acceleration.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #83
This is an excellent graphic illustrating the location of the two quakes (the second in red is clearly right under the town) and just how many aftershocks there have been.

http://www.geonet.org.nz/var/storage/images/media/images/news/2011/lyttelton/57171-1-eng-GB/Lyttelton.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #84
If one checks Paul Nicholls's earthquake map, one sees in the two hours following the mag 6.3, there were two others at mag 5.7 and 5.9, punctuated by several in the 3 - <5 range.
6.3M, depth: 5km 12:51
4.9M, depth: 5km 12:56
5.7M, depth: 7km 13:04
4.2M, depth: 9km 13:21
4.4M, depth: 7km 13:23
4.2M, depth: 9km 13:31
4.5M, depth: 5km 13:46
4.5M, depth: 5km 14:15
4.5M, depth: 4km 14:20
3.4M, depth: 5km 14:30
3.3M, depth: 5km 14:37
4.0M, depth: 8km 14:39
5.9M, depth: 7km 14:50

And there have been many more since.

The liquefaction of the ground was considerable more severe with the Lyttelton earthquake than with the Darfield quake which was further away and deeper.
 
  • #85
apeiron said:
This is an excellent graphic illustrating the location of the two quakes (the second in red is clearly right under the town) and just how many aftershocks there have been.

http://www.geonet.org.nz/var/storage/images/media/images/news/2011/lyttelton/57171-1-eng-GB/Lyttelton.jpg

Stay strong apeiron, and again... I'm really glad that you and dadface are alive and whole, with families in similar condition.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #86
Astronuc, aperion,

I am no geologist or expert in seismology, however, the thumbnail below taken from the links you both provided reminds me of a zipper, a buried one that is slowly rising to the surface as it heads toward the ocean.

Rhody...
 

Attachments

  • CC earthquake.JPG
    CC earthquake.JPG
    45.9 KB · Views: 383
  • #87
rhody said:
Astronuc, aperion,

I am no geologist or expert in seismology, however, the thumbnail below taken from the links you both provided reminds me of a zipper, a buried one that is slowly rising to the surface as it heads toward the ocean.

Rhody...

Make that a sticky zipper, and I think you're closer to the truth than you may know!
 
  • #88
rhody said:
Astronuc, aperion,

I am no geologist or expert in seismology, however, the thumbnail below taken from the links you both provided reminds me of a zipper, a buried one that is slowly rising to the surface as it heads toward the ocean.

Rhody...
There appear to be a series of east-west faults, which are a consequence of the those two old (ostensibly extinct) volcanos and the mountains. The Canterbury plains are alluvial deposits having been deposited from the erosion of the mountains to the west.

I think they will have to rethink the seismic hazard in that area.

Some of the day recorded.



 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #89
Astronuc said:
There appear to be a series of east-west faults, which are a consequence of the those two old (ostensibly extinct) volcanos and the mountains. The Canterbury plains are alluvial deposits having been deposited from the erosion of the mountains to the west.

I think they will have to rethink the seismic hazard in that area.

Some of the day recorded.





When you say things like "ostensibly extinct", you give me agita! :wink:

Kidding aside, thanks for an excellent explanation, and... liquifaction is not something you can defend against AFAIK. You can put a building on rockers or springs. make it bend like a willow, but if the foundation goes... game over. You may be able to prevent catastrophic collapse (NZ versus Haiti), but the structure will still need to be destroyed and rebuilt.

I feel terrible for (and I say this affectionately) all Kiwis, feathered and mammalian. NZ seems like such a peaceful and welcoming place... :frown:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #90
Astronuc said:
There appear to be a series of east-west faults, which are a consequence of the those two old (ostensibly extinct) volcanos and the mountains. The Canterbury plains are alluvial deposits having been deposited from the erosion of the mountains to the west.

I think they will have to rethink the seismic hazard in that area.

Some of the day recorded.





Astronuc,

That was absolutely horrifying to watch, I only could watch about 2/3rds of the first video, at about 1:30 or so a woman in a black dress with head injuries was being led away. I found out later she lost her brother who was sitting in a car next to her, he pushed her away and saved her life. The video news story was so sad. it all seems so surreal.

Rhody...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #91
nismaratwork said:
When you say things like "ostensibly extinct", you give me agita! :wink:

Kidding aside, thanks for an excellent explanation, and... liquifaction is not something you can defend against AFAIK. You can put a building on rockers or springs. make it bend like a willow, but if the foundation goes... game over. You may be able to prevent catastrophic collapse (NZ versus Haiti), but the structure will still need to be destroyed and rebuilt.
The hazard maps apparently did not predict the peak accelerations up to 2.2g, and certainly not in the Christchurch area. What happened was unexpected. I think seismologists didn't expect something like 6 or above just SE of Christchurch.

The experts will have to revise their understanding of the dynamics.

The liquefaction has to do with the water in the soil under Christchurch which sits between two rivers beside a bay, and has at least one stream running through it, and the fact that the earthquakes were so strong.

I feel terrible for (and I say this affectionately) all Kiwis, feathered and mammalian. NZ seems like such a peaceful and welcoming place... :frown:
It's going to be difficult for a lot of folks for quite some time. An article in the Herald indicated that some might leave the area or the country permanently.
 
  • #92
rhody said:
Astronuc,

That was absolutely horrifying to watch, I only could watch about 2/3rds of the first video, at about 1:30 or so a woman in a black dress with head injuries was being led away. I found out later she lost her brother who was sitting in a car next to her, he pushed her away and saved her life. The video news story was so sad. it all seems so surreal.

Rhody...
There's many heartbreaking stories, but some good ones too.

Ahsei "Ace" Sopoaga tried to save the brother of that woman.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10709041

The brother who saved his sister was Jaime Gilbert.
http://www.3news.co.nz/Young-father...ister/tabid/309/articleID/199985/Default.aspx

And this story
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10709040
 
  • #93
Astronuc said:
The hazard maps apparently did not predict the peak accelerations up to 2.2g, and certainly not in the Christchurch area. What happened was unexpected. I think seismologists didn't expect something like 6 or above just SE of Christchurch.

The experts will have to revise their understanding of the dynamics.

The liquefaction has to do with the water in the soil under Christchurch which sits between two rivers beside a bay, and has at least one stream running through it, and the fact that the earthquakes were so strong.

It's going to be difficult for a lot of folks for quite some time. An article in the Herald indicated that some might leave the area or the country permanently.

Thank you for this information, and the links... I really can only say... I'm so sorry for the people of NZ.
 
  • #94
nismaratwork said:
Stay strong apeiron, and again... I'm really glad that you and dadface are alive and whole, with families in similar condition.

Thanks people for sending your good wishes.Just to clarify something it is one of my sons and his family who live in Christchurch,I live in the UK.
In their area they had a lot of mud rising due to liquefaction but they are gradually getting the place cleaned up.I think one of the biggest problems is the anxiety caused by the continuing aftershocks.Many people are finding it difficult to get a good nights sleep.Whilst the clear up continues my grand children have been sent to stay with their Kiwi grandmother in Hokitika on the west coast.She runs a pub so things are not all bad.
 
  • #95
Dadface said:
Thanks people for sending your good wishes.Just to clarify something it is one of my sons and his family who live in Christchurch,I live in the UK.
In their area they had a lot of mud rising due to liquefaction but they are gradually getting the place cleaned up.I think one of the biggest problems is the anxiety caused by the continuing aftershocks.Many people are finding it difficult to get a good nights sleep.Whilst the clear up continues my grand children have been sent to stay with their Kiwi grandmother in Hokitika on the west coast.She runs a pub so things are not all bad.

Wow, I'm glad your sons and families are safe; defiitely time to bite the neck off a bottle!
 
  • #96
Rolling boulders from a hill

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/video.cfm?c_id=1&gal_objectid=10709223&gallery_id=117013

These folk have remarkable sense of humor. Luckily no one was killed, although one man was killed elsewhere when debris fell on him while helping another person.


Another site tracking the quakes - http://quake.crowe.co.nz/
 
Last edited:
  • #97
Spent most of the day touring quake-struck bits of town and at grassroots reconstruction meetings.

Current repair bill for the two quakes is said to be NZ$20b, of which about NZ$12b is covered by international reinsurance :smile:. We have a somewhat unique scheme for national disaster insurance here.

On the zipper hypothesis, it seems the first quake was actually four smaller faults that connected up. And this one is not directly connected. So fits a story where the region is riddled with smallish mag 5 and 6 faults. Over a 100,000 years, they would probably become aligned to make a longer big one (of which there are at least a half dozen known further north).

I was in the roughest part of town (our nearest to a ghetto) for much of the morning, and there was a party atmosphere with church sausage sizzles, more bread and fruit than anyone could eat. There is certainly some burglaries going on, but no big deal.

Again the place has to be given an A+ for resilience. There are search and rescue teams from a dozen other countries and they all say it is the best organised operation they have ever seen (well, September 4 did give us plenty of practice of course).

Yet still, a huge and long effort ahead to get back to normal. No illusions there.
 
  • #98
apeiron said:
Spent most of the day touring quake-struck bits of town and at grassroots reconstruction meetings.

Current repair bill for the two quakes is said to be NZ$20b, of which about NZ$12b is covered by international reinsurance :smile:. We have a somewhat unique scheme for national disaster insurance here.

On the zipper hypothesis, it seems the first quake was actually four smaller faults that connected up. And this one is not directly connected. So fits a story where the region is riddled with smallish mag 5 and 6 faults. Over a 100,000 years, they would probably become aligned to make a longer big one (of which there are at least a half dozen known further north).

I was in the roughest part of town (our nearest to a ghetto) for much of the morning, and there was a party atmosphere with church sausage sizzles, more bread and fruit than anyone could eat. There is certainly some burglaries going on, but no big deal.

Again the place has to be given an A+ for resilience. There are search and rescue teams from a dozen other countries and they all say it is the best organised operation they have ever seen (well, September 4 did give us plenty of practice of course).

Yet still, a huge and long effort ahead to get back to normal. No illusions there.

No illusions... maybe that's why you plan so well.
 
  • #99
Aftershocks are still continuing. There was a mag 4.8 near the coast under Sumner.

Recovery operations continue and planning for rebuilding is contingent upon understanding the risk for similar or stronger quakes.

Some discussions:

http://www.asce.org/Disaster-Preparedness-and-Response/Biggs-New-Zealand-Earthquake-Diary.aspx

Biggs said:
the Feb. 22 aftershock was twice the design level earthquake. Given that, there is no surprise there were failures! The public response is, why didn't officials demand demolition or full strengthening? Officials did what was historically correct, but this aftershock did not follow the pattern.
This is often the case.

Darfield Quake - http://db.nzsee.org.nz:8080/web/lfe-darfield-2010/home

Christchurch/Lyttelton Quake - http://db.nzsee.org.nz:8080/en/web/chch_2011/home
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #100
The Christchurch experience shows what could happen in a lot of places. Here is Portland sounding worried.

http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2011/02/comparing_portlands_quake_risk.html

Geologists have located three shallow faults that cut beneath the most populated parts of Portland. The largest, the Portland Hills Fault, may pose the greatest risk. It stretches from Oregon City to Scappoose. Corvallis and Seattle also straddle active crustal faults.

Yeats says New Zealand has some of the most progressive building codes in the world and is better prepared for earthquakes than most U.S. cities. Schools in Christchurch appear to have stood up well. Many Oregon schools would not. More than half are at a high risk of collapse from a quake, according to a 2007 report by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries.

And then...

Disaster preparedness in Oregon has largely focused on a different kind of earthquakes: those from the collision of massive sections of the Earth's crust, called tectonic plates. From Northern California to British Columbia, an ocean-spanning slab called the Juan de Fuca Plate is plunging beneath the North American plate. In a complete rupture across this Cascadia subduction zone, geologists expect magnitude-9 ground-shaking to persist for several minutes across much of Oregon and Washington. They rupture about once every 450 years.
 
Back
Top