Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
- 22,525
- 7,502
The hazard maps apparently did not predict the peak accelerations up to 2.2g, and certainly not in the Christchurch area. What happened was unexpected. I think seismologists didn't expect something like 6 or above just SE of Christchurch.nismaratwork said:When you say things like "ostensibly extinct", you give me agita!
Kidding aside, thanks for an excellent explanation, and... liquifaction is not something you can defend against AFAIK. You can put a building on rockers or springs. make it bend like a willow, but if the foundation goes... game over. You may be able to prevent catastrophic collapse (NZ versus Haiti), but the structure will still need to be destroyed and rebuilt.
The experts will have to revise their understanding of the dynamics.
The liquefaction has to do with the water in the soil under Christchurch which sits between two rivers beside a bay, and has at least one stream running through it, and the fact that the earthquakes were so strong.
It's going to be difficult for a lot of folks for quite some time. An article in the Herald indicated that some might leave the area or the country permanently.I feel terrible for (and I say this affectionately) all Kiwis, feathered and mammalian. NZ seems like such a peaceful and welcoming place...![]()
