A Number Raised to the m Power

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Power
AI Thread Summary
Raising a number to the mth power, where m is a positive even number, does not guarantee a real result for complex numbers. For instance, (1+2i)^4 results in a complex number, disproving the initial assumption. When m equals 2, the expression (a + bi)(a + bi) expands to a^2 - b^2 + 2abi, which is only real if either a or b is zero. Thus, the statement is only true for real or purely imaginary numbers when m is 2. The discussion highlights the need to analyze complex number behavior under exponentiation.
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5
Hello Everyone,

I was wondering, does anyone know of a proof that showed if a number is raised to the mth power, where m is a positive even number, the number is always real?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(1+2i)4 = -7-24i
 
Drats! I was hoping it was true! How about if m were only 2? Would the statement then be true?
 
It isn't: (a + bi)(a + bi) = a^2 + 2abi + b^2i^2 = a^2 + 2abi - b^2
 
Bashyboy said:
Drats! I was hoping it was true! How about if m were only 2? Would the statement then be true?

##(1+i)^2=1+2i-1=2i##

Your claim will only be true for ##m=2## if the number is only real or imaginary. This is clear by expanding a complex number as a binomial.

##(a+bi)^2=a^2-b^2+2abi##

In order for this to be real, either ##a## or ##b## must be zero. You should check the case when ##m=4## by squaring ##(a^2-b^2+abi)## to see what you get.


Edit: I see that you figured it out as I was posting
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
3
Replies
105
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top