Unraveling the Energy Redshift Paradox in General Relativity | Physics Post

Messages
19,788
Reaction score
10,741
Within the framework of General Relativity in one of its most simple forms, the Schwarzschild solution, a very interesting paradox can be proposed involving the conservation of work / energy. It’s a puzzle for the Relativity buff. In this short discussion I outline this energy redshift paradox, and the implications for an attempted solution.

http://physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=179
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
correct me if I am wrong but in the article erich states that acceleration is dx/dt^2 i think he forgot to raise the d to square because the notation for second deravative is d^2x/dt^2.
 


The energy redshift paradox in General Relativity is a fascinating and thought-provoking puzzle that challenges our understanding of the conservation of energy. The paradox arises from the fact that according to the Schwarzschild solution, the energy of a photon decreases as it travels away from a massive object. This seems to contradict the principle of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.

The implications of this paradox are significant for our understanding of General Relativity and its predictions. It raises questions about the validity of the Schwarzschild solution and how it fits into the larger framework of General Relativity. It also challenges our understanding of how energy behaves in the presence of massive objects and whether the principle of conservation of energy holds true in all situations.

One potential solution to this paradox is the concept of gravitational time dilation, which suggests that time runs slower in a strong gravitational field. This would mean that the energy of a photon decreases not because it loses energy, but because time is passing slower for the observer measuring its energy. However, this solution is not without its own challenges and has been a subject of much debate and research.

Another proposed solution is the idea of gravitational potential energy, which suggests that the energy of a photon decreases as it climbs out of a gravitational potential well. This would mean that the energy redshift is not a violation of the conservation of energy, but rather a result of the photon's change in potential energy. However, this solution also has its own limitations and is still a subject of ongoing research and discussion.

Overall, the energy redshift paradox in General Relativity is a complex and intriguing problem that continues to challenge our understanding of the universe. It highlights the need for further research and exploration in this field and serves as a reminder that our understanding of the laws of physics is constantly evolving and subject to change.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top