A 1600 kg object is initially at rest 400 km above the earth’s surface.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Scarlett
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rest Surface
AI Thread Summary
A 1600 kg object falls from 400 km to 100 km above Earth's surface, generating 8.3x10^8 J of heat energy. The calculations involve gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy equations, leading to the need for accurate values of radius in meters. A mistake was identified in the calculation of the difference in gravitational potential, specifically in converting kilometers to meters. The correct difference should yield a value of 6x10^-9 instead of 7.37 x 10^-12. The discussion highlights the importance of unit conversion in physics problems.
Scarlett
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1600 kg object is initially at rest 400 km above the earth’s surface. The object falls straight
down and generates 8.3x10^8J of heat energy while descending to an altitude of 100 km.
What is the velocity of the object at this altitude?
(http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u488/ScatlettArmadillo/Question20.jpg)

Homework Equations



Ek = (mv^2)/2
Ep = -GMm/r
G=6.67^-11
Mass of Earth = 5.98x10^24 kg
Radius of Earth = 6380000 m
Force of Gravity = GMm/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution



http://i1070.photobucket.com/albums/u488/ScatlettArmadillo/Question20-1.jpg
Once I got to the final step I had to find the root of a negative, which is not possible, so I must have made an error somewhere else, but I can't seem to work out where.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution is correct, but the mistake lies in 1/r2 - 1/r1, this equals 6x10^-9, not 7.37 x 10^-12.
 
Xisune said:
Your solution is correct, but the mistake lies in 1/r2 - 1/r1, this equals 6x10^-9, not 7.37 x 10^-12.

How?
(1/(6380000+100))-(1/(6380000+400))
=(1/6380100)-(1/6380400)
=1.57x10^-7-1.58x10-7
=7.37x10^-12
 
Oh, god, I knew I'd've made a stupid mistake, I forgot to convert km to m. Ugh, stupid, but at least I got it now, thanks for the help :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top