A 3.5 nC charge is at the origin and a -10 nC charge is at x = 2 cm

  • Thread starter Thread starter Count
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Origin
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the x-coordinate where a proton would experience no net force between a 3.5 nC charge at the origin and a -10 nC charge at x = 2 cm. Participants clarify that the distance squared to the -10 nC charge should not be expressed as (0.02+x)^2, emphasizing the need for proper unit usage. The confusion arises from interpreting the placement of the proton, with some asserting that the only valid position is to the left of the origin, leading to a potential answer of -2.9 cm. It is noted that coordinates to the left of the origin are conventionally negative, which is crucial for solving the problem correctly. The conversation highlights the importance of clarity in problem setup and the correct application of physics principles.
Count
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 3.5 nC charge is at the origin and a -10 nC charge is at x = 2 cm.

At what x-coordinate could you place a proton so that it would experience no net force?
Relevant Equations
(3.5/x^2)=(10/(.02+x)^2)
Apparently the answer is not 2.9 cm or 7.4mm. I've looked at similar questions in this thread and solving the exact same way gives me the same answers. I set it up as (3.5/x^2)=(10/(.02+x)^2).
What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We cannot tell you what you did wrong if we don't know what you did. Please post your solution.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, Count and MatinSAR
Count said:
Homework Statement: A 3.5 nC charge is at the origin and a -10 nC charge is at x = 2 cm.

At what x-coordinate could you place a proton so that it would experience no net force?
Relevant Equations: (3.5/x^2)=(10/(.02+x)^2)

Apparently the answer is not 2.9 cm or 7.4mm. I've looked at similar questions in this thread and solving the exact same way gives me the same answers. I set it up as (3.5/x^2)=(10/(.02+x)^2).
What am I doing wrong?
The distance squared to the -10 nC charge is not (0.02+x)^2 … even if x is in meters. (Please use appropriate units in equations)
 
  • Like
Likes Count and MatinSAR
Orodruin said:
The distance squared to the -10 nC charge is not (0.02+x)^2 … even if x is in meters. (Please use appropriate units in equations)
I don't understand. If 3.5nC is at the origin, and -10nC is 2cm to the right of that, then the only place for a point charge to be placed is to the left of the origin. That unknown distance is x, so the distance from -10nC to the proton is .02m+x. Solving for x would give the results I got, and my mistake may be in not using the negative sign to show the point charge to the left of the origin, so the answer would be -2.9cm. Is this not correct? If so, why not?
 
Count said:
I don't understand. If 3.5nC is at the origin, and -10nC is 2cm to the right of that, then the only place for a point charge to be placed is to the left of the origin. That unknown distance is x, so the distance from -10nC to the proton is .02m+x. Solving for x would give the results I got, and my mistake may be in not using the negative sign to show the point charge to the left of the origin, so the answer would be -2.9cm. Is this not correct? If so, why not?
I agree with 2.9cm left of origin. You can rule out the other solution to the quadratic.
Taking x as distance left of the origin without saying so was a bit confusing.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Count
Count said:
and my mistake may be in not using the negative sign to show the point charge to the left of the origin,
That is your mistake. The statement of the problem asks "At what x-coordinate could you place a proton so that it would experience no net force?" Coordinates to the left of the origin are conventionally negative.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and Count
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K