A capacitor-like system, is this really a cap?

  • Thread starter Thread starter joemok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion about the capacitor-like system, it is established that as the earthed plate A moves closer to the positively charged plate B, the electric potential of B decreases while the electric field strength remains constant. The charge on plate A does not change because it is grounded, which prevents any net charge flow despite the movement. The capacitance increases as the plates approach, leading to a decrease in voltage while maintaining the charge on the isolated plate. The key point is that equilibrium is reached without additional charge flow into plate A, as the system stabilizes with the existing charge distribution. Overall, the analysis suggests that the behavior of the system aligns with capacitor principles despite some initial confusion about charge movement.
joemok
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A is an earthed metal plate while B is a positively charged metal plate parallel to A. The separation between the plates is much less than the length of each plate. If A is moved closer to B, what would happen to the electric potential of B and the electric field strength between the plates?

Homework Equations


I haven't pick the quick capacitor equations as i think there are differences and the equations:
1.E= V/d, are not practical here as both V and d decreases.
2.V = Q/C, i doubt if Q change

At last, I use E= Q/(AK), where K is the permitivity

The Attempt at a Solution


1. As A which is negatively charged moves closer to B, it solely establish a more negative potential at B and the resultant of the potential decreases.

2.On the other hand, the voltage of A should increase as it is closer to B, but as A is earthed, there are some negative charges flow into A to make it 0V, i.e. unchanged.
Applying E = Q/(AK) we know the E field produced by A increases and that of B is constant as charge on B is constant.
i.e. E resultant increases

My teacher told me to treat it like a capacitor and as the capacitor is on a open circuit, there must not be changes on Q, i.e. (Q1-Q2)/2. As a result of V=Q/C decreases and E=Q/(AK) remains unchanged.

Here comes my actual questions:
1. Is there really no charge flow even when one plate is earthed?
2. what is wrong with my approach?

Note:
1.the model answer: V decreases, E constant.
2. My teacher also told me to think in another way, the earthed A plate is just to make the potential reference constant. and we can see both plates isolated, in this case V can be seem as the potential difference of the plates.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
i really need help. Please say something about the approaches, is it valid?
 
Here comes my actual questions:
1. Is there really no charge flow even when one plate is earthed?
2. what is wrong with my approach?

1. The charged plate is isolated and so keeps constant Q. The charge on the grounded plate will exactly match that on the charged plate, as soon as the transient current stops.

2. the subtle thing is that the capacitance increases as the plates are brought together, so the voltage falls - and the field stays constant ( as your teacher as said).
 
Mentz114 said:
1. The charged plate is isolated and so keeps constant Q. The charge on the grounded plate will exactly match that on the charged plate, as soon as the transient current stops.

Thank you.
But i am still curious about what is wrong with my arguments that negative charge on A will increase. Can you explain to me?
 
Usually equilibrium states have the least potential energy and I expect that's what happens here.
Because the capacitance increases and the voltage drops, there no need for the charge on A to change to maintain equilibrium.
 
Mentz114 said:
Usually equilibrium states have the least potential energy and I expect that's what happens here.
Because the capacitance increases and the voltage drops, there no need for the charge on A to change to maintain equilibrium.

Won't B makes A's potential higher than 0v if there are no charge flowing into A?
Even though it is not a complete circuit, is it possible for some charge flowing into A?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top