A collision, help me double check this ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jbreezy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics problem involving a mass sliding down an inclined plane and colliding elastically with another mass at rest. The first part calculates the speed of the first mass (m1 = 4.5 kg) after sliding down, resulting in a velocity of 7 m/s. The second part addresses the elastic collision, yielding post-collision velocities of -2.03 m/s for m1 and 4.96 m/s for m2 (8.2 kg). Finally, the height m1 reaches back up the incline is calculated to be 0.104 m. The calculations and results are confirmed as correct by participants in the discussion.
Jbreezy
Messages
582
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A mass, m1 = 4.5 kg is released form rest 2.5 m above the ground on a inclined plane (35 degrees). m1 slides down incline and makes a smooth transition to flat plane then strikes m2 = 8.2 kg, which is at rest, calculate the speed of both masses after elastic collision and find how high m1 will go back up the incline.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution



Part 1.
Figure out how fast m1 is going after traveling down incline.
So,
mgh = 1/2 mv^2
manipulate for v and you get v = sqrt(2gh)
sub in values and you get v = 7m/s
Part 2 the collision
We will use
Vi2 = (m1- m2/ m1+m2) (vi1) + 2m2/m1+m2(v2I)
The V2i is 0 so it is gone.
Vi2 = (m1- m2/ m1+m2) (vi1)
We substitute in the values and we get -2.03m/s
For mass 2 we use.

V2II = (2m1)/ (m1+m2) (vi1) + (m1-m2/ m1+m2 )(V2i)
V2i once again drops out
V2II = (2m1)/ (m1+m2) (vi1)
Sub in values and we get 4.96m/s


Lastly get the height for mass one back up incline.
We know the velocity so we can use
1/2mvII = mgh
solve for h and get h = VII/2g
And I got .104m

I hope it is right please double check me.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I agree with your answers
 
thx dude
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top