A couple of concepts I would like to understand.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lifprasir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concepts Couple
AI Thread Summary
Electrons move from higher to lower potential, which can create confusion when considering attractive and repulsive forces between charges. In the scenario with negative charges (Q1 and Q2) and a positive charge (Q3), electrons are attracted to the positive charge but also experience repulsion from the negative charges. The net movement of electrons depends on the relative distances and magnitudes of the charges involved. Understanding potential in terms of energy magnitudes clarifies that while electrons may have energy, their movement is influenced by the forces acting on them. Overall, the interplay of attractive and repulsive forces alongside potential differences determines electron behavior in electric fields.
Lifprasir
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
They say that electrons move from the higher potential to the lower potential. For example, in this situation.



Q1 and Q2 are negative charges and Q3 is positive. But, the equipotential is lower on the Q1 and Q2, so by definition of potential difference, the electron would go from the positive to the negative. But isn't there another concept that says opposites attract? so shouldn't the electron go to the positive charge? I don't quite understand what is happening here.
 

Attachments

  • prob04a_threeqcontour.gif
    prob04a_threeqcontour.gif
    6.6 KB · Views: 643
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the electron would want to go towards the positive charge, the force due to opposite charges is attractive, but there is also a repulsive force due to the negative charge. The direction Q1 will travel for example depends on the relative distances q2 and q3 are away from it and also the charges they have.

I think I know where your coming from about high to low potential, but try thinking in terms of magnitudes, an example is in a circuit with a battery and a resistor. In magnitude the electrons have a high voltage at the start and a low voltage at the end. With the setup you have shown for example, say the proton has a high postive charge, then thinking in a magnitude type manner the electron will have zero joules of energy when it reaches the proton. It will technically have +5J or so of energy, but it won't use that energy to move around and so it is useful to think of it as being 0J to move around with.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top