Schools A difficult choice - General Relativity or Dark Matter....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a choice between two PhD offers: one in General Relativity and Early Universe Cosmology at Queen Mary University of London, and the other in particle physics phenomenology and dark matter at Royal Holloway University of London. The decision is challenging as it will significantly impact the individual's career trajectory. The preference leans towards General Relativity, influenced by recent enjoyment and skill development in Differential Geometry. Participants emphasize the importance of aligning the choice with long-term career goals, noting that both fields involve significant programming and computational skills. Backup career options include roles in financial technology, especially if research opportunities do not materialize, highlighting the versatility of skills gained in either program.
DrSuage
Messages
46
Reaction score
10
Hi all,

I've just been made offers to two different institutions - one to study General Relativity and Early Universe Cosmology, and one to study particle physics phenomenology and dark matter at PhD level, and I'm having a hard time choosing!

Relativity and Cosmology is Queen Mary University of London
Dark Matter is Royal Holloway University of London

Which would you choose? Why?

I'm currently leaning towards GR but its a really tough decision as it will massively affect the trajectory of my potential career.

Your collective thoughts will be much appreciated. Ta
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A lot of it depends upon your career goals. What's your long term plan?
 
In a dream world I'd like to get a postdoc and continue doing research - I do understand that the numbers aren't good in that respect but if you don't try, you can't succeed.

Arghghghghghghg... at the start of this year I would have taken dark matter no question, but I've really enjoyed my GR recently and have massively expanded my repertoire in Differential Geometry and really enjoyed that too...
 
What's your backup plan if research doesn't pan out? I'd imagine that GR involves a lot of computer modelling and programming, so that could be useful in some potential alternate careers. If you're more on the experimental and equipment side of physics, particle physics might land you a good job at a nuclear power plant or something.
 
Both are theoretical projects, and I imagine both will involve significant amounts of programming.

If research doesn't work out, then I'd probably try to get a job in the Financial tech sector - maybe coding or numerical modelling.
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top