A difficult integral, perhaps involving trig substitutions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter icosane
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral Trig
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the integral of 1/(1+x^6) dx, which is presented as a challenge problem in a calculus course. Participants are exploring various methods to approach the integral, including trigonometric substitutions and partial fraction decomposition.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss attempts at using trigonometric substitutions and integration by parts, expressing confusion over the complexity of the resulting expressions. Some explore the factoring of the denominator and the use of partial fractions, while others question the handling of imaginary numbers in the process.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants sharing insights on factoring techniques and the use of the quadratic formula. There is a mix of successful attempts and continued struggles, particularly regarding the integration of expressions involving imaginary numbers. Guidance has been offered on the proper setup for partial fractions, but no consensus has been reached on the best approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge nature of the problem and the potential for complex solutions involving imaginary numbers. There is also mention of the use of online calculators to verify answers, which may influence the discussion dynamics.

icosane
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The integral of 1/(1+x^6) dx

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem was given as a "challenge/bonus problem" on the first day of Calc 2, earlier today. Considering we were going over trig substitutions, I suppose there is probably some trig trick to it. Doing it by parts isn't helping... I just get a longer more messy expression to integrate. I also tried a u substitution. I set u = x^(3) to make the integral seem like I could pull out an arctan, But I keep ending up only making the situation worse.

I've typed in the expression into an online integral calculator so I know what the answer is, but I'm confused on how to go about tackling this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What answer did it give?
 
The denominator can be factored into (x2 + 1)(x4 - x2 + 1), and the quartic factor can be factored into (x2 - 1/2 - i/2*sqrt(3))(x2 - 1/2 + i/2*sqrt(3)). At that point you could break up the integral using the technique of partial fractions.
 
Thanks mark, can you give me the name of the technique used to factor out the quartic function, or give a little explanation yourself? I can see that it works but I'm curious as how one would go about splitting up a quartic function using imaginary numbers. I have yet to come across this technique in any of my classes. The answer I got for the integral is quite long so I'm not going to write it out but I used the integral calculator found at http://integrals.wolfram.com/index.jsp

Thanks again
 
All I used to factor the quartic was the quadratic formula, since this particular quartic was quadratic in form, with a 4th-degree term, a 2nd-degree term, and a constant term.

If you substitute u = x2, the quartic part becomes u2 - u + 1 = 0, and then use the quadratic formula to solve for u (= x2).
 
Okay, I sat down today and tried to solve the thing and still can't get it. When I do the partial fractions method I just end up with long ridiculous equations with imaginary numbers in them that don't cancel out. Am I supposed to split up each of the terms again? Or is there a whole different way to approach this problem? I was talking about it with someone who knows how to do it but won't tell me and he looked confused when I mentioned imaginary numbers.

Also just for reference the answer the online integral calculator gave was...

(sqrt(3)*log(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1)-sqrt(3)*log(x^2-sqrt(3)*x+1)+2*atan(2*x+sqrt(3))+2*atan(2*x-sqrt(3))+4*atan(x))/12
 
Notice that [tex]x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)[/tex].

Since [tex]x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 = (x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x)[/tex] **Note that the x is not under the sqrt sign**

And so [tex]x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x)[/tex].

You can now use partial fractions.
 
[tex] x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 [/tex]

Thanks for the quick reply! I see that this works... is this a common algebraic maneuver for factoring quartic functions? I have never seen anything like this up to this point.
 
I encountered this question a couple months ago, and after a couple frustrating days I finally realized what the trick was.

It was the first time I've also seen something like it :)
 
  • #10
icosane said:
[tex] x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 [/tex]

Thanks for the quick reply! I see that this works... is this a common algebraic maneuver for factoring quartic functions? I have never seen anything like this up to this point.

You complete the square and obtain a difference of squares, so you can easily factor from there. If I spot a root immediately, then I use synthetic division; if not, then I use this method. But that's just me :)
 
  • #11
JG89 said:
Notice that [tex]x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^4 - x^2 + 1)[/tex].

Since [tex]x^4 - x^2 + 1 = (x^2 + 1)^2 - 3x^2 = (x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x)[/tex] **Note that the x is not under the sqrt sign**

And so [tex]x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x)[/tex].

You can now use partial fractions.

:frown:

I keep coming back to this trying to solve it and just can't get it. Am I supposed to set up partial fractions over the these three terms,

[tex]x^6 + 1 = (x^2 +1)(x^2 + 1 - \sqrt(3)x) (x^2 + 1 + \sqrt(3)x)[/tex]

because even if I did, I wouldn't know how to integrate A/(x^2+1+3^(1/2)*x)... but when I try to split that up using the quadratic formula I get another imaginary number. Am I just supposed to use partial fractions over those 3 terms and then just use integration by parts to solve for some constant over a quadratic?
 
  • #12
When doing partial fractions with quadratics in the denominator, you must use Ax+B, Cx+D, and Ex+F, not A, B, and C. After you do partial fractions, you can algebraically manipulate each expression. For instance, let's say you have to integrate 2xdx/(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1). You can rewrite this as the integral of (2x+sqrt(3)-sqrt(3))/(x^2+sqrt(3)*x+1). You can then split this up into two integrals; for the first one, you can use substitution, and for the second you will have to manipulate it again by completing the square in the denominator and then using a trig-sub (your answer will involve arctan).
 
  • #13
It would be Ax + B and Cx + D and etc for the numerators, not just a single A B or C constant. If you end up with just a constant, like A/(x^2+1+3^(1/2)*x), then you could complete the square and integrate for an arctan solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K