A familiar probability question

  • Thread starter Thread starter mesarmath
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability
mesarmath
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
hi,

i have been studying for GRE subject

and i saw this question but i could not solve it

x , y and z are selected independently and at random from the interval [0,1], then the probability that x is bigger than y*z is ?

the answer is 3/4

but i want to know how? , i guess it should be solved by double integral.

thanks in advance for any help

edit: i just figured out that \int_{0}^{1} \int_{0}^{1} (1-yz) dy dz = 3/4
but i could not figure out how the area above the curve x=yz represents that probability geometrically ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mesarmath! :smile:
mesarmath said:
… but i could not figure out how the area above the curve x=yz represents that probability geometrically ?

(it ain't a curve, it's a surface :wink:)

Because for each value y and z, the proportion of x > yz is the proportion below the surface, which is yz/1, and the proportion of x > yz is the proportion above the surface, which is (1 - yz)/1.
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi mesarmath! :smile:


(it ain't a curve, it's a surface :wink:)

Because for each value y and z, the proportion of x > yz is the proportion below the surface, which is yz/1, and the proportion of x > yz is the proportion above the surface, which is (1 - yz)/1.


thanks

so we were looking for a volume,
curve was the thing that makes me confused

thanks again :)
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top