A filter with a narrower-than-Fourier Transform passband?

  • Thread starter Thread starter virtualetters
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filter Transform
virtualetters
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If I have a signal that I'd like to filter very precisely (say, a few Hz bandwidth), I feel like the "best" one can possibly do is to take a time sample long enough to get a discrete transform frequency resolution of the same width, erase all but the frequency component of interest, and then transform back.

But am I supposing the Fourier transform is more fundamental than it really is? Could I use, say, a recursive filter or other set of basis functions, to have a few Hz passband over timescales much shorter than the transform-limit? Or is the (Fourier) transform limit really a fundamental limit?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If your sample is shorter then it will necessarily have a larger width, and you won't be able to distinguish signals of similar frequency reliably. If you don't need that: Good.
Determining e.g. the central frequency works with much shorter samples. If you know your signal has a very narrow width then you can determine its frequency very accurately, not limited by the Fourier transformation.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top