A follow up of the question about gears of the winder

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gears
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of a winder's gear system, specifically the interaction between a 100-tooth gear and a 102-tooth worm gear. It is confirmed that the gears are not glued and rotate at different rates, with the 102-tooth gear lagging behind the 100-tooth gear by 1/51 turns for every 30 rotations of gear A. The calibration of the inner circle on the counter is questioned, as it uses a non-standard labeling system. The participants clarify the purpose of the gears and the significance of their orientation, emphasizing the importance of contact area to reduce pressure during operation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gear mechanics and terminology, including worm gears and gear ratios.
  • Familiarity with rotational dynamics and how gear interactions affect speed and torque.
  • Knowledge of gear calibration and measurement systems.
  • Basic comprehension of mechanical engineering principles related to gear design.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of gear ratios and their impact on mechanical systems.
  • Study the design and function of worm gears and their applications in machinery.
  • Explore calibration techniques for mechanical counters and measuring devices.
  • Investigate the effects of gear tooth design on performance and efficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, hobbyists working with gear systems, and anyone interested in the design and functionality of winding mechanisms will benefit from this discussion.

stephen
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi all!
I open a new thread since I am going to post another picture, and this would overload the old thread.

The first picture shows the number of teeth of the meshing gears.
I was wrong that the pair of worm gears are glued. They are not glued as mentioned by Q_Goest. And the two gears are rotating at different rates.

The second picture shows the label of the counter.

What I am going to ask is the meaning of the label.

From the number of teeth of the gears indicated in the first picture, it is known that the 102 worm gear rotate at a lower speed than the 100 one.
I find that for every 30 turns of gear A would finally cause Gear C(102teeth) to lag behind GearC(100teeth) by 1/51 turns.

So in the label, it can be visualised that when the 30 turns are rotated, the outer point would just finished rotating one complete circle. And the inner pointer would move one little grid. (Some error in the picture drawn, the inner circle should be divided into 51 divisons, instead of 50 divisions. I find this in the real label provided.)

First of all, is my intepretation correct?

If yes, I have got some questions.

Why do the calibration of the inner circle so strange? Why don't it just writes "10, 20, 30, 40, 51" but "1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, 5100" instead?


Second, if I am the user of the this winder, and I am going to count how many revolution of have I rotated the handle. If I am to do so, I need to multipy the readings of 30, right? Don't you think this is strange? Have I interpreted the usage wrongly?

And it seems to me that the outer circle is of no practical use...It only returns to zero for every 30 times of rotation of the handle.

Sorry for such a long thread...I am really such an idiot. Hope to receive your nice help~
 

Attachments

  • winderf.JPG
    winderf.JPG
    33.5 KB · Views: 562
  • counter mark ff.JPG
    counter mark ff.JPG
    39.8 KB · Views: 589
Engineering news on Phys.org
oops..
I just knew that I could post pictures in the 'reply'..
sorry for starting another thread...
Please relocate this thread if any inconvenience is caused.
 
I discovered that I asked a silly question.
The winder is not going to record how many turns the handle retotate but the 30 teeth gear...So the label should really be marked "1000, 2000, 3000, 4000.etc"
I think I now understand the entire mechanism.

But I still don't quite understand the orientation of the pair of worm gears. i.e. the "turbine" shape...
Q_Geost, do you mean the pair of grears' orientation is such that the drive gear would have a greater contact area with the pair of worm gear? And this reduce the pressure?
 
Each time gear B rotates, the worm gear rotates once and the two gears it is rotating (the 100 tooth and 102 tooth worm wheels) only rotate by 1 tooth. Also, gear B will rotate 100/30 or 3.333 times for each time you rotate the handle. This assumes there is only an idler gear between the two which isn't certain given the picture.

Regarding the "turbine" look of those two gears, I'm assuming you're referring to the slighty slanted angle on the teeth. There's a couple of pictures of typical worm gear and worm wheel assemblies here:
http://www.qtcgears.com/e-store/Images/Worm.jpg
http://www.tasonic.com.tw/images/PAGE6/6-2.JPG
In each case you can see the teeth on the worm wheel are slightly angled so they mesh with the worm gear (screw shaped gear). Is that what you were referring to? If so, the reason for the slight angle on the teeth should be fairly obvious. It allows the worm gear and worm wheels to contact over a larger area.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have encountered a vertically oriented hydraulic cylinder that is designed to actuate and slice heavy cabling into sections with a blade. The cylinder is quite small (around 1.5 inches in diameter) and has an equally small stroke. The cylinder is single acting (i.e. it is pressurized from the bottom, and vented to atmosphere with a spring return, roughly 200lbs of force on the spring). The system operates at roughly 2500 psi. Interestingly, the cylinder has a pin that passes through its...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K