A giant ball of ICE hits a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter vorcil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Ice Star
AI Thread Summary
A giant ball of ice hitting a star would begin to boil off before making contact, similar to a comet's tail. If the ice mass were sufficiently large and fast, some fragments might survive until impact. However, the overall effect on the sun would likely be negligible. The sun's violent processes far exceed the impact of a moon-sized ice ball. Thus, such an event would not significantly alter the sun's behavior or characteristics.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
What happens?

[PLAIN]http://img15.imageshack.us/img15/5575/1271475630826.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, long before it would "hit" our sun, it would start to "boil-off"(think comet tail)
But if it were big and fast enough perhaps part of it could survive until outer impact. But I doubt there would be any net effect on the sun.
The processes our sun goes through are much more violent than it's reaction to a moon-sized ice ball hitting it.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top