A good book to learn calculus by

  • Thread starter Thread starter Forestman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book Calculus
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around resources for self-studying calculus, highlighting various recommended textbooks. "The Complete Idiots Guide to Calculus" by Michael Kelley is praised as an excellent resource. Other notable mentions include "Calculus Made Easy" by Silvanus P. Thompson, "Differential and Integral Calculus" by Richard Courant, and "Calculus" by Anton, Bivens, and Davis, which is emphasized as a comprehensive choice for serious learners, particularly for multivariable calculus. The importance of a solid foundational understanding is stressed, with warnings against relying solely on easier texts like those by Sherman Stein, which may not adequately prepare students for advanced topics. The discussion also points to the availability of free online calculus resources and suggests combining textbook study with lecture materials, such as MIT's online courses, for a more effective learning experience.
Forestman
Messages
212
Reaction score
2
I am currently in the process of teaching myself calculus. Anyway one of the best books that I have ever come across is The Complete Idiots Guide to Calculus, by Michael Kelley.

It is a wonderful book.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not seen that book. If you have one you like, you don't need advice.

Some of my favorites include: Calculus made easy by Silvanus P Thompson; Differential and Integral calculus by Richard Courant; Introduction to Calculus and analysis by Courant and John; Calculus, by Michael Spivak; Calculus by Tom Apostol; Calculus and analytic geometry by Thomas and Finney, 9th edition; Calculus and analytic geometry by G.B. Thomas, 2nd or 3rd edition; Lectures on freshman calculus, by Cruse and Granberg; Calculus by Edwards and Penney, 1st edition - you can get the 4th edition or so for as little as 99 cents, an excellent deal.
 
I am a self studier of Calculus. I have quite a few books including Thomas. If you have intention to go far in Calculus, I think the clear winner is Calculus by Anton, Bivens and Davis. It might not be the easiest book to read and learn. BUT easy is not the most important with calculus if you are serious. I avoid this book at the beginning and stay with Sherman Stein and Thomas. Stein is particular easy. Problem is when the subject get harder towards the end, Stein started to fall apart. Thomas is better but not in the same league yet.

Anton present material in a very logical way, you have to learn the terminlogies and logical method. But once you follow, it is a better book by a lot. Some of the easier book tend to skip the more precise definitions that you think you can skip, but you really cannot. It will come back and bite you every single time. It is very very important to get the foundation right. If you start off with shaky foundation, it will be very hard to move pass the second semister. The multi-variable is where Anton shine. You will notice that's where the other books starting to get confuse. Anton with the straight procedure, no short cut approach really shine. When you get to the most confusing part...Line Integral, Vector Field, Divergence Theorem and Stoke's Theorem, Stein's book just fall apart, I wasted so much time on that stupid book going around and around. Even Thomas is not doing well. Then when I finally bite the bullet and get onto Anton, it was like a light bulb light up.

Anton is the only book I read that push in finding the surface integral using jecobian and cross product of two vectors which is the hardest to understand...but after wasting all the time with the other books, I conclude this is the best way. This book is a must have for self studier.

You really need to get at least 3 books for self study. Thomas might be a good second book because when you get too flustrated, Thomas might be able to throw you a life line with easier explanation. But stay with the Anton. I am still using the Anton as a reference when I am studying electrodynamics.


Now, if you just want to learn some calculus and have no intention to go beyond the second semister, Then Sherman Stein and Anthony Barcelos is a very easy book to learn at least the first one and half semister to the point of "methods of Integrations". It is very easy. Anything farther than that, dump that book. The lack of formal logic of Stein will not matter if you don't pursue higher math.
 
I cleared calculus 1 and 2 with help of this book

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0071635343/?tag=pfamazon01-20

I can really recommend it. I did attend lectures while using it simultaneously. I think watching the MIT lectures while using this book will work as well. Good luck.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
just order Calc and analytic geometry 3rd ed
and schaums guide book1

gonna try to get a leg up on calc 1 before fall starts :p
 
The book is fascinating. If your education includes a typical math degree curriculum, with Lebesgue integration, functional analysis, etc, it teaches QFT with only a passing acquaintance of ordinary QM you would get at HS. However, I would read Lenny Susskind's book on QM first. Purchased a copy straight away, but it will not arrive until the end of December; however, Scribd has a PDF I am now studying. The first part introduces distribution theory (and other related concepts), which...
I've gone through the Standard turbulence textbooks such as Pope's Turbulent Flows and Wilcox' Turbulent modelling for CFD which mostly Covers RANS and the closure models. I want to jump more into DNS but most of the work i've been able to come across is too "practical" and not much explanation of the theory behind it. I wonder if there is a book that takes a theoretical approach to Turbulence starting from the full Navier Stokes Equations and developing from there, instead of jumping from...
Back
Top