A Good, Clear, Introductory Text?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lrl4565
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Introductory Text
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for a clear introductory physics textbook, specifically comparing the 1978 edition of "Physics" by Halliday and Resnick to the newer "Fundamentals of Physics." The user expresses frustration with the confusing explanations in "Physics for Dummies" and seeks a more straightforward resource. Recommendations favor the Halliday and Resnick edition for its clarity, while noting that newer editions are often less essential, primarily aimed at maintaining publisher profits against the used textbook market.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts such as speed, velocity, and acceleration.
  • Familiarity with calculus, as it aids in grasping physics principles.
  • Knowledge of vector addition in physics.
  • Awareness of textbook editions and their relevance in academic studies.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between the 1978 edition and newer editions of Halliday and Resnick's "Physics."
  • Explore reviews and recommendations for introductory physics textbooks beyond "Physics for Dummies."
  • Investigate supplementary resources that clarify physics concepts, such as online courses or video lectures.
  • Learn about the impact of textbook editions on learning outcomes and student experiences in physics.
USEFUL FOR

Students new to physics, educators seeking clear teaching materials, and anyone looking to strengthen their foundational understanding of physics concepts.

lrl4565
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
So, I started with "Physics for Dummies", but it quickly became confusing. They use speed and velocity interchangeably... calling acceleration the rate at which speed changes, talking about negative speed, telling me that vector a + vector b = vector c. After internet research, I'm pretty sure these things are not right.

I want a textbook that is, above all, CLEAR.

I've been hearing things about Halliday and Resnick. I was thinking about purchasing the 1978 version of "Physics". Is there a difference between this and the newer Fundamentals of Physics?

https://www.amazon.com/dp/047134530X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471320579/?tag=pfamazon01-20

About my math and science background:

I have never taken any physics courses. I took Calculus last year (in high school, with an engineering textbook), and have a fairly decent grasp of the concepts, but am not strong.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I highly recommend that edition of H&R "Physics".

"Fundamentals of Physics" is watered down, but should still be fine.

The only reason new editions of these texts keep coming out is to keep the publisher from losing money to the used textbook market. You're not missing anything by getting older editions.
 

Similar threads

High Energy What is the level of Aitchison & Hey's QFT books?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Engineering Need Advice on Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics Textbook
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Quantum Is "Quantum Physics for Dummies" a good textbook for starting QP?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Self teaching Calculus for physics?
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Other How Do You Guys Keep Up with New Textbook Releases?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
What is the difference between 'Physics' and 'Fundamentals of Physics'
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
Intro Physics Seeking a good Undergraduate physics textbook
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
15K
Intro Physics Competitive Physics by Jinhui Wang and Bernard Ricardo
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Other Books for Geometry, Real Analysis and EM
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Classical Classical electrodynamics for high-energy physicists
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K