# Homework Help: A homework in Direct Circuit for beginning students

1. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

Left blank

2. Relevant equations

Left blank

3. The attempt at a solution

Well, I am not familiar with the Latex system on this website, just because I am a newbie and I rarely access to this forum. I have a problem (may be simple for you guys) but I still need a solution from you, or at least, please give me the answer if you are boring with typing a lot of formulae.

#### Attached Files:

• ###### Problem Direct Circuit.pdf
File size:
19.3 KB
Views:
56
2. May 23, 2014

### nsaspook

3. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

Thanks naspook
I did have the solution that was solved by myself, and I think it's suitable for pupils, not a student but one day, my little brother gave a solution that was different to mine, and he believes that my solution is not right, So I need an answer from you to check.

4. May 23, 2014

### nsaspook

Why don't you give your answer and the steps you took to find your results first in the proper format for this forum.

5. May 23, 2014

### phinds

You need to read the forum rules. We help folks figure out how to solve problems, we do NOT just "give answers".

6. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

Yeah, my steps: this DC circuit is a familiar one and we only need to know that with the given assumption as the ammeter is ideal, the potential difference between two points of $\ R_5$ is zero, then as a consequence $\ {I_5}=0A$. And $\ {I_1}=2A$, $\ {I_2}=2A$,$\ {I_3}={I_4}=1A$, then from Kirchooff law, $\ {I_A}=4A$.
Net resistance of the circuit is $\ {R_{AB}}=6Ω$

7. May 23, 2014

### BvU

Yeah, well, you sure take big steps. Especially from I5 to I1, 2,3,4. Perhaps you want to explain the 2,2,1,1 in a little more detail ? And: what did your young brother find ?

8. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

to BvU:
Well, this problem can be solved simply by re-draw the circuit with the rule as: Consider all points that have the equal potential is one. So we can have a new and simple diagram, from it we get I1, I2, I3, I4, and of course, I5=0 as mentioned above. It's my steps

My little brother: I think he did make a small fault when he re-draw the diagram

9. May 23, 2014

### BvU

Still: what did your young brother find ?

I agree with I5. Also with the two 1. But don't you become suspicious at all when 30 V over 6 Ohm gives 4 A ?

10. May 23, 2014

### nsaspook

Points for trying but you need to review a few things. It's aways good to work backwards (what voltage is across each node with your current calculations) from your result to check for errors.
http://www.usna.edu/Users/cs/vincent/suppnotes/EE301Topic06.pdf [Broken]

Last edited by a moderator: May 6, 2017
11. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

Of course, nasaspook, we should review it, but I did knew this theory many years ago when I was in 9-grade class and I did give my answer.
Could anyone give me your numerical answer, that is all I need

12. May 23, 2014

### fdbjruitoirew

Could anyone give the answer for me? I need it to check, this problem seems to be simple, but I need the answer from you

13. May 24, 2014

### BvU

Is not the way PF works. You have a choice to ignore answers to questions and hints to improve your work. You can not ask for 'the answer'.