A limit involving a recurrent sequence: a(n+1)=a(n)*(a(n)+4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter anachin6000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Sequence
anachin6000
Messages
50
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Let (an)n≥1 be a sequence with a1≥0 and an+1=an(an+4), n≥1. Compute limn→∞ (an)(1/(2n)).

Homework Equations


a1≥0
an+1=an(an+4), n≥1
L = limn→∞ (an)(1/(2n))

The Attempt at a Solution


Firstly, I had tried to see if an can be expressed only in terms of a1, but I couldn't get something out of this idea.

Then, I used the root criterion:
an+1/an = an+4 → 4 + l, where limn→∞ an = l ∈ℝ∪{-∞,∞}
⇒ limn→∞ (an)1/n = 4 + l
But L= limn→∞ (an)(1/(2n)) = (limn→∞ (an)1/n)limn→∞ n/(2n) = (4 + l)0
So:
- if l∈ℝ\{-4}, then L=1
- and if l∈{-∞, -4,∞}, then L is a ∞0 or 00 indeterminate.

Though, the sequence is either constant (equal to 0) if a1 = 0 (so L=1) or has limn→∞ an = +∞ (a1 > 0) if, so the job is not done.

Knowing that I have to deal with a ∞0, I rewrote the limit as follows:
L= limn→∞ (an)(1/(2n)) = limn→∞ eln[(an)(1/(2n))] = elimn→∞ (ln(an))/(2n)
So everything gets down to computing L'=limn→∞ (ln(an))/(2n)

This is where I got stuck. I tried to use the root criterion again, I tried Stoltz-Cesaro Theorem, both with no success.

Can anyone help me compute this limit or at least give me a direction to continue?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A very interesting problem. With some examples, I found very good approximations for very small and very large a1, and a good approximation over the whole range, but nothing that would fit exactly.

For very large a1, it is possible to identify the leading contributions (the highest powers of a), and develop a formula for the limit. That is not exact, but the error goes to zero for a1 to infinity.
 
  • Like
Likes anachin6000
It helps to write a_{n+1} = a_n^2(1 + \frac{4}{a_n}) and set b_n = \frac{\log a_n}{2^n} so that <br /> b_{n+1} - b_n = \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} \log \left( 1 + \frac{4}{a_n} \right).<br /> Now a_n \to \infty for any a_1 &gt; 0, so there exists N \in \mathbb{N} such that if n \geq N then a_n &gt; \frac{4}{e^2 - 1}. Hence for n \geq N we have <br /> b_{n+1} - b_n = \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} \log \left( 1 + \frac{4}{a_n} \right) &lt; \frac{1}{2^n}. But then b_n is cauchy, and so converges to some finite limit. It is possible that the exact limit depends on a_1 though, which is awkward.

EDIT: Since we know b_{n+1} - b_n in terms of a_n we can immediately sum from n=1 to n=N-1 to obtain <br /> b_N = b_1 + \sum_{n=1}^{N-1} \frac{1}{2^{n+1}} \log \left( 1 + \frac{4}{a_n} \right) and hence write down an expression for \lim_{n \to \infty} a_n^{1/2^n}. Then all we need is an expression for a_n in terms of a_1.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes anachin6000
pasmith said:
Then all we need is an expression for a_n in terms of a_1.
If we get that, where is the point in bn? You would replace a direct limit (take that expression to the power of 1/(2n)) with a series.

The limit does depend on a0 in a nontrivial way.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top