Solving X^4+131=3y^4: No Integer Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtl42
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integer
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the equation X^4 + 131 = 3y^4, which is posed as a problem from Terence Tao's book, seeking to demonstrate the absence of integer solutions. Initial attempts involve modular arithmetic, revealing that x must be even and y must be odd based on calculations mod 16. Further analysis shows that x cannot be divisible by 3 when considered mod 3. The exploration of mod 5 indicates a contradiction, suggesting that no integer solutions exist. The use of modular arithmetic is emphasized as a strategic approach for solving Diophantine equations.
dtl42
Messages
118
Reaction score
0
This is a problem from Terence Tao's book, and I cannot locate the solution anywhere, so I thought I'd post it here.


1. Homework Statement

X^4+131=3y^4, Show that the equation has no solutions when x and y are integers.

Homework Equations


None? Not sure.


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought of using modular arithmetic, but I can't really work it correctly.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Okay, let's do some mods.

Mod (powers of) 2: 4th powers are 1 or 0 mod 16. 131 is 3 mod 16. So the LHS can be 3 or 4 mod 16 and the RHS can be 0 or 3 mod 16. Therefore we must have x even and y odd.

Mod 3: 4th powers are 1 or 0 mod 3. 131 is 2 mod 3. So the LHS can be 2 or 0 mod 3, and the RHS is 0 mod 3. So x cannot be divisible by 3.

Mod 5: 4th powers are 1 or 0 mod 5. 131 is 1 mod 5. So the LHS can be 1 or 2 mod 5, and the RHS can be 0 or 3 mod 5. Uh-oh! Looks like we're done!

Comments on strategy: When you're trying to solve a Diophantine equation, using mods is usually the place to start. If only one power appears, you might be able to guess what mod to use by Fermat's Little Theorem (in fact, in this case, this tells you to try 5, and that's the one that works). Powers of 2 and 3 are also good choices because there tend to be few possible residues mod those numbers. Using the given numbers can be useful too -- for example, it may also be possible to show that there are no solutions to this by looking mod 131. But I'm too lazy to compute all of the fourth powers mod 131...
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top