A material/ substance that does not allow the through it

  • Thread starter Thread starter scupydog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Material
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of materials that can completely block magnetic fields, highlighting superconductors as perfect diamagnets that expel magnetic flux until a critical field is reached, known as the Meissner effect. While superconductors can effectively shield against magnetic fields, they are limited by their critical field strength. The conversation also touches on the pursuit of perpetual motion machines using magnetism and gravity, with participants emphasizing that such machines violate the laws of thermodynamics and energy conservation. Despite the interest in exploring these concepts, the consensus warns against the futility of seeking perpetual motion. The dialogue ultimately underscores the importance of adhering to established physical laws in scientific inquiry.
scupydog
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Has anyone invented a material/ substance that does not allow the field of a magnet through it
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Google: Magnetic Shielding
 
Superconductors also have that property. Specifically, Type 1 superconductors expel flux perfectly up to a critical field where they can no longer keep the field out. This is called the Meissner effect.
 
You can read up more on Diamagnetism. A superconductor is a perfect diamagnet, where it keeps magnetic fields from its interior. But a superconductor cannot keep a magnetic field out for all intensities. Once the critical field is met, it looses its perfect Diamagnetism and can no longer oppose magnetic fields.
 
thanks for your replies, very helpfull in my quest for a perpetual motion machine using magnetism and gravity
 
They're only helpful if they've convinced you to abandon the quest!
 
Reading another post about gravity being a type of energy, from which i derived it isn't. Therefore a PM machine using only gravity and magnetism does not break the law of energy conservation. I am sure there's more to it than that, if any could enlighten me i would be gratefull.https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=138215
 
scupydog said:
Reading another post about gravity being a type of energy, from which i derived it isn't. Therefore a PM machine using only gravity and magnetism does not break the law of energy conservation. I am sure there's more to it than that, if any could enlighten me i would be gratefull.


https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=138215

Perpetual motion is simply not allowed by thermodynamics. Please save yourself the time of a wild goose chase. If you insist on continuing, at least spare the poor readers of PF forum from yet another fruitless thread.

Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Back
Top