- #1
jeremy22511
- 29
- 0
So I was wondering why a single problem can have two entirely different approaches (based on contradictory axioms) to solving it? For example, consider sunlight. Sunlight always comes from a slightly different direction than we see because of refraction. They can be studied with Euclidean geometry (e.g. Snell's law), but they can also be studied with a specific non-Euclidean geometry made for them. They are based on completely different sets of axioms so why can they arrive at the same answer and conclusions?
I can't think of other examples right now. Would appreciate it if someone would answer :)
I can't think of other examples right now. Would appreciate it if someone would answer :)