A modified double slit screen scenario- what would happen?

bcrelling
Messages
69
Reaction score
2
This scenario is identical to the classic double slit screen experiment except that the photon is at extremely high energy. The energy is so high that the photon's momentum maybe registered by a mechanical measuring device(i.e spring or accelerometer attached to a receiver).

At the moment of emission(before the photon has hit the screen/receiver) the emitter will recoil with the momentum opposite to the photon's. Surely this would give us information about the path of the photon before the photon is registered at the screen/receiver? What stops the wave function from being collapsed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not get coherence if the recoil is (at least in theory) sufficient to determine the path, and you do not get interference.
Apart from that, the wavelength of the photon would have to be extremely short, and the slits would have to be far apart. That would ruin double-slit effects anyway.
 
bcrelling said:
This scenario is identical to the classic double slit screen experiment except that the photon is at extremely high energy. The energy is so high that the photon's momentum maybe registered by a mechanical measuring device(i.e spring or accelerometer attached to a receiver).

At the moment of emission(before the photon has hit the screen/receiver) the emitter will recoil with the momentum opposite to the photon's. Surely this would give us information about the path of the photon before the photon is registered at the screen/receiver? What stops the wave function from being collapsed?

This is Einstein's Weighable Light Box idea and it was a precursor to the EPR paper. Bohr used Einstein's own Relativity works to show that at each step, there are things such as Time Dilation that must be accounted for in the thought experiment.

Bohr 1, Einstein 0.

CW
 
I ate a meatball sandwich today.

Bohr 1, Subway 0

Anywho, is there a quantitative reason why a large recoil would ruin coherence?
 
It gives a different evolution of the wavefunction for those two different slits.
Alternative description: The phase would depend strongly on the emission angle in an unpredictable way.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top